0
TECHNICAL BRIEFS

Trabecular Bone Contributes to Strength of the Proximal Femur Under Mediolateral Impact in the Avian

[+] Author and Article Information
N. Passi, A. Gefen

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

J Biomech Eng 127(1), 198-203 (Mar 08, 2005) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1835366 History: Received December 09, 2003; Revised August 18, 2004; Online March 08, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ray,  N. F., Chan,  J. K., Thamer,  M., and Melton,  L. J., 1997, “Medical Expenditures for Treatment of Osteoporotic Fractures in the United States in 1995: Report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation,” J. Bone Miner. Res., 12, pp. 24–35.
National Osteoporosis Foundation, Disease Statistics, www.nof.org
Seeman,  E., 2003, “Pathogenesis of Osteoporosis,” J. Appl. Physiol., 95, pp. 2142–2151.
Riggs,  B. L., Wahner,  H. W., Seeman,  E., Offord,  K. P., Dunn,  W. L., Mazess,  R. B., Johnson,  K. A.; Melton,  L. J., 1982, “Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur and Spine with Aging. Differences Between the Postmenopausal and Senile Osteoporosis Syndromes,” J. Clin. Invest., 70, pp. 716–723.
Weiss,  A., Arbell,  I., Steinhagen-Thiessen,  E., and Silbermann,  M., 1991, “Structural Changes in Aging Bone: Osteopenia in the Proximal Femurs of Female Mice,” Bone (N.Y.), 12, pp. 165–172.
Sharma,  D. N., 1944, “Note on the Comparison of Rat and Chicken Bone,” Indian J. Med. Res., 51, pp. 686–687.
Biewener,  A. A., 1982, “Bone Strength in Small Mammals and Bipedal Birds: Do Safety Factors Change with Body Size?,” J. Exp. Biol., 98, pp. 289–301.
McAlister,  G. B., and Moyle,  D. D., 1983, “Some Mechanical Properties of Goose Femoral Cortical Bone,” J. Biomech., 16, pp. 577–589.
Carrier,  D., and Leon,  L. R., 1990, “Skeletal Growth and Function in the California Gull (Larus californicus),” J. Zool., 222, pp. 375–389.
Currey,  J. D., 1987, “The Evolution of the Mechanical Properties of Amniote Bone,” J. Biomech., 20, pp. 1035–1044.
Erickson,  G. M., Catanese,  J., and Keaveny,  T. M., 2002, “Evolution of the Biomechanical Material Properties of the Femur,” Anat. Rec., 268, pp. 115–124.
Taylor,  D., 2000, “Scaling Effects in the Fatigue Strength of Bones from Different Animals,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1, 206, pp. 299–306.
Rath,  N. C., Balog,  J. M., Huff,  W. E., Huff,  G. R., Kulkarni,  G. B., and Tierce,  J. F., 1999, “Comparative Differences in the Composition and Biomechanical Properties of Tibiae of seven-and seventy-two-week-old male and female broiler breeder chickens,” Poult Sci., 78, pp. 1232–1239.
Wirtz,  D. C., Schiffers,  N., Pandorf,  T., Radermacher,  K., Weichert,  D., and Forst,  R., 2000, “Critical Evaluation of Known Bone Material Properties to Realize Anisotropic FE-simulation of the Proximal Femur,” J. Biomech., 33, pp. 1325–1330.
Wilson,  S., and Thorp,  B. H., 1998, “Estrogen and Cancellous Bone Loss in the Fowl,” Calcif. Tissue Int., 62, pp. 506–511.
Leblanc,  B., Wyers,  M., Cohn-Bendit,  F., Legall,  J. M., Thibault,  E., and Florent,  J. M., 1986, “Histology and Histomorphometry of the Tibia Growth in Two Turkey Strains,” Poult Sci., 65, pp. 1787–1795.
Morgan,  E. F., Bayraktar,  H. H., and Keaveny,  T. M., 2003, “Trabecular Bone Modulus-Density Relationships Depend on Anatomic Site,” J. Biomech., 36, pp. 897–904.
Wilson,  S., Solomon,  S. E., and Thorp,  B. H., 1998, “Bisphosphonates: A Potential Role in the Prevention of Osteoporosis in Laying Hens,” Res. Vet. Sci., 64, pp. 37–40.
Wachter,  N. J., Augat,  P., Mentzel,  M., Sarkar,  M. R., Krischak,  G. D., Kinzl,  L., and Claes,  L. E., 2001, “Predictive Value of Bone Mineral Density and Morphology Determined by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography for Cancellous Bone Strength of the Proximal Femur,” Bone (N.Y.), 28, pp. 133–139.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food Safety and Inspection Service, 2003, “Classes of poultry,” Federal Register 68 , pp. 55902–55905 (Docket No. 99-017P).
Goh,  J. C., Ang,  E. J, and Bose,  K., 1989, “Effect of Preservation Medium on the Mechanical Properties of Cat Bones,” Acta Orthop. Scand., 60, pp. 465–467.
Linde,  F., and Sorensen,  H. C., 1993, “The Effect of Different Storage Methods on the Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone,” J. Biomech., 26, pp. 1249–1252.
Recker,  R. R., 1989, “Low Bone Mass May not be the Only cause of Skeletal Fragility in Osteoporosis,” Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 191, pp. 272–274.
Singh,  M., Nagrath,  A. R., and Maini,  P. S., 1970, “Changes in Trabecular Pattern of the Upper end of the Femur as an Index of Osteoporosis,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol., 52, pp. 457–467.
Frankel, V. H., and Nordin, M., 2001 “Biomechanics of Bone” in Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System, 3rd ed., edited by V. H., Frankel, and M., Nordin, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 26–59.
Keyak,  J. H., Rossi,  S. A., Jones,  K. A., Les,  C. M., and Skinner,  H. B., 2001, “Prediction of Fracture Location in the Proximal Femur using Finite Element Models,” Med. Eng. Phys., 23, pp. 657–664.
Rath,  N. C., Huff,  G. R., Huff,  W. E., and Balog,  J. M., 2000, “Factors Regulating Bone Maturity and Strength in Poultry,” Poult Sci., 79, pp. 1024–1032.
Whitehead,  C. C., and Fleming,  R. H., 2000, “Osteoporosis in Cage Layers,” Poult Sci., 79, pp. 1033–1041.
Kocamis,  H., Yeni,  Y. N., Kirkpatrick-Keller,  D. C., and Killefer,  J., 1999, “Postnatal Growth of Broilers in Response to in ovo Administration of Chicken Growth Hormone,” Poult Sci., 78, pp. 1219–1226.
Delaere,  O., Dhem,  A., and Bourgois,  R., 1989, “Cancellous Bone and Mechanical Strength of the Femoral Neck,” Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 108, pp. 72–75.
Liebschner,  M. A., Kopperdahl,  D. L., Rosenberg,  W. S., and Keaveny,  T. M., 2003, “Finite Element Modeling of the Human Thoracolumbar Spine,” Spine, 28, pp. 559–565.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Longitudinal cross sections through proximal femora of (a) poultry (with the limb skeleton shown on the left) and (b) human. Cross sections are scaled to similar size to allow comparisons of proportional thickness of the cortex and the trabecular architecture. Architecture of the avian femur was depicted based on anatomical observations by the authors. Dominant stresses on the human femoral cortex are marked with bold arrows (tension ←→; compression (→←).
Grahic Jump Location
The experimental setup: (a) The low impact pendulum testing machine (LIPTM); (b) illustrations of specimen preparation showing removal of core trabecular tissue (upper right) and the proximal femur specimen fixed prior to impact testing (left). The Charpy hammer (design shown on bottom right) strikes under the femoral head.
Grahic Jump Location
Results of impact testing: (a) distribution of outcomes of impact testing of control specimens (N=35) depending on the impact energy Ep, and (b) outcomes of fracture tests with noncontrol specimens (N=95) plotted as function of the amount of core trabecular tissue that was extracted from the epiphysis in each trial (absolute weight W and weight fraction in %). A region of “no-break” outcomes (shaded) and a “break” threshold (dashed line) are marked. NB=no break,P=partial break,C=complete break.

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In