0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Fluids/Heat/Transport

Mathematical Model for Pressure Losses in the Hemodialysis Graft Vascular Circuit

[+] Author and Article Information
Steven A. Jones

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 10348, Ruston, LA 71272e-mail: sajones@coes@latech.edu

Song Jin

Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Room B301, 418 N. Bond St., Baltimore, MD 21231

Ameya Kantak

University of Utah, 50 S. Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9208

David A. Bell

Hemametrics, Inc., 695 North 900 West, Kaysville, UT 84037-4118

William D. Paulson

Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, GA, 30912-3140

J Biomech Eng 127(1), 60-66 (Mar 08, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1835353 History: Received February 06, 2004; Revised September 02, 2004; Online March 08, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Paulson,  W. D., Ram,  S. J., and Zibari,  G. B., 2002, “Vascular Access: Anatomy, Examination, Management,” Semin Nephrol., 22, pp. 183–194.
Hakim,  R., and Himmelfarb,  J., 1998, “Hemodialysis Access Failure: A Call to Action,” Kidney Int., 54, pp. 1029–1040.
, 1997, “Excerpts From United States Renal Data System 1997 Annual Data Report,” Am. J. Kidney Dis., 30 (suppl 1), pp. S1–S195.
, 2001, “K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access,” Am. J. Kidney Dis., 37 (suppl 1), pp. S137–S181.
May,  R. E., Himmelfarb,  J., Yenicesu,  M., Knights,  S., Ikizler,  T. A., Schulman,  G., Hernanz-Schulman,  M., Shyr,  Y., and Hakim,  R., 1997, “Predictive Measures of Vascular Access Thrombosis: A Prospective Study,” Kidney Int., 52, pp. 1656–1662.
Neyra,  N. R., Ikizler,  T. A., May,  R. E., Himmelfarb,  J., Schulman,  G., Shyr,  Y., and Hakim,  R. M., 1998, “Change in Access Blood Flow Over Time Predicts Vascular Access Thrombosis,” Kidney Int., 54, pp. 1714–1719.
McCarley,  P., Wingard,  R. L., Shyr,  Y., Pettus,  W., Hakim,  R. M., and Ikizler,  T. A., 2001, “Vascular Access Blood Flow Monitoring Reduces Access Morbidity and Costs,” Kidney Int., 60, pp. 1164–1172.
Frinak,  S., Zasuwa,  G., Dunfee,  T., Besarab,  A., and Yee,  J., 2002, “Dynamic Venous Access Pressure Ratio Test for Hemodialysis Access Monitoring,” Am. J. Kidney Dis., 40, pp. 760–768.
Paulson,  W. D., Ram,  S. J., Birk,  C. G., and Work,  J., 1999, “Does Blood Flow Accurately Predict Thrombosis or Failure of Hemodialysis Synthetic Grafts? A Meta-Analysis,” Am. J. Kidney Dis., 34, pp. 478–485.
Paulson,  W. D., Ram,  S. J., Birk,  C. G., Zapczynski,  M., Martin,  S. R., and Work,  J., 2000, “Accuracy of Decrease in Blood Flow in Predicting Hemodialysis Graft Thrombosis,” Am. J. Kidney Dis., 35, pp. 1089–1095.
Paulson,  W. D., 2001, “Blood Flow Surveillance of Hemodialysis Grafts and the Dysfunction Hypothesis,” Semin. Dial.,14, pp. 175–180.
McDougal,  G., and Agarwal,  R., 2001, “Clinical Performance Characteristics of Hemodialysis Graft Monitoring,” Kidney Int., 60, pp. 762–766.
Dember,  L. M., Holmberg,  E. F., and Kaufman,  J. S., 2002, “Value of Static Venous Pressure for Predicting Arteriovenous Graft Thrombosis,” Kidney Int., 61, pp. 1899–1904.
Paulson, W. D., and Jones, S. A., 2003, “Hemodynamics of the Vascular Access: Implications for Clinical Management,” In: Hemodialysis Vascular Access and Peritoneal Dialysis Access, edited by C. Ronco, Contrib Nephrol (vol 142). Karger, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 238–253.
Shah,  R. K., 1978, “A Correlation for Laminar Hydrodynamic Entry Length Solutions for Circular and Noncircular Ducts,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 100, pp. 177–179.
White, F. M., 1991, Viscous Fluid Flow, edited by L. Beamesderfer and J. Morris, McGraw–Hill, Boston, pp. 291–293.
Schneck, D. J., 1995, “An Outline of Cardiovascular Structure and Function,” In: The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, edited by Bronzino. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 3–14.
White, F. M., 1991, Viscous Fluid Flow, edited by L. Beamesderfer and J. Morris, McGraw–Hill, Boston, pp. 116–118.
White, F. M., 1999, Fluid Mechanics, edited by K. T. Kane, McGraw–Hill, Boston, p. 368.
Potter, M. C., and Wiggert, D. C., 1997, Mechanics of Fluids, Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., pp. 303–304.
Young,  D. F., 1979, “Fluid Mechanics of Arterial Stenosis,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 101, pp. 157–175.
Ram,  S. J., Magnasco,  A., Jones,  S. A., Barz,  A., Zsom,  L., Swamy,  S., and Paulson,  W. D., 2003, “In Vivo Validation of Glucose Pump Test for Measurement of Hemodialysis Access Blood Flow,” Am. J. Kidney Dis., 42, pp. 752–760.
Cokelet, G. R., 1972, “The Rheology of Human Blood,” In: Biomechanics: Its Foundations and Objectives, edited by Fung, Perron, and Anliker, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 63–103.
Jones,  S. A., and Paulson,  W. D., 2002, “Effect of Turbulent Flow on the Pressure-Flow Relationship in Hemodialysis Grafts (Abstract),” J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 13, p. 408A.
Jones,  S. A., and Fronek,  A., 1987, “Analysis of Break Frequencies Downstream of a Constriction in a Cylindrical Tube,” J. Biomech., 20, pp. 319–327.
Massey, B. S., 1989, Mechanics of Fluids, Van Nostrand–Reinhold Co. Ltd, London, pp. 141–146.
Jones,  S. A., and Fronek,  A., 1988, “Effects of Vibration on Steady Flow Downstream of a Stenosis,” J. Biomech., 21, pp. 903–914.
Young,  D. F., and Tsai,  F. Y., 1973, “Flow Characteristics in Models of Arterial Stenosis. I: Steady Flow,” J. Biomech., 6, pp. 395–410.
Seely,  B. D., and Young,  D. F., 1976, “Effect of Geometry on Pressure Losses Across Models of Arterial Stenoses,” J. Biomech., 9, pp. 439–448.
Talukder,  N., Kerayannacos,  P. E., Nerem,  R. M., and Vasko,  J. S., 1977, “An Experimental Study of the Fluid Dynamics of Multiple Noncritical Stenoses,” J. Biomech. Eng., 99, pp. 74–82.
Young,  D. F., and Tsai,  F. Y., 1973, “Flow Characteristics in Models of Arterial Stenoses. II: Unsteady Flow,” J. Biomech., 6, pp. 547–559.
Kamiya,  A., and Togawa,  T., 1980, “Adaptive Regulation of Wall Shear Stress to Flow Change in the Canine Carotid Artery,” Am. J. Physiol., 239, pp. H14–H21.
Zarins,  C. K., Zatina,  M. A., Giddens,  D. P., Ku,  D. N., and Glagov,  S., 1987, “Shear Stress Regulation of Artery Lumen Diameter in Experimental Atherogenesis,” J. Vasc. Surg., 5, pp. 413–420.
Sullivan,  K. L., Besarab,  A., Bonn,  J., Shapiro,  M. J., Gardiner,  G. A., and Moritz,  M. J., 1993, “Hemodynamics of Failing Dialysis Grafts,” Radiology, 186, pp. 867–872.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Model of graft vascular circuit. Sources of ΔP are: (1) Inflow artery, (2) arterial anastomosis, (3) graft, (4) venous anastomosis, (5) stenosis, and (6) outflow vein. Model assumes distal artery and vein are ligated or that flow in these vessels is minimal and can be ignored. Parentheses indicate equations that were used to model ΔP at each point in circuit.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Loss coefficients from White (see Ref. 19) shown on a log–log plot. Transformed data show close linear relation between ln(Kl) and ln(luminal diameter [Dp]) with slope=−1/2.6 by least-squares regression analysis (r2=0.998); (b) Data and least-squares fit from (a) without transformation. Data extrapolated to diameter of inflow artery yield loss value=3.4.
Grahic Jump Location
Experimental apparatus for in vitro flow studies
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted and measured pressure drops (ΔPs) for artery, arterial anastomosis, graft, venous anastomosis, and vein. Parentheses indicate equations that were used to model ΔP.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted and experimental pressure drop (ΔP) across the stenoses. Lines were computed with Young’s equation [Eq. (7)].
Grahic Jump Location
ΔPs as a function of position along graft vascular circuit. Figure compares ΔPs measured in experimental apparatus with ΔPs predicted by unadjusted and adjusted engineering equations. Adjustments improved fit of theoretical equations with experimental data. Conditions are Q=780 mL/min, luminal diameter reduction=50%, Hct=37%. The pressure drop across the entire circuit differs for each case since it is not possible to simultaneously match both flow rate and pressure drop for the different models.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In