Characterization of the Nuclear Deformation Caused by Changes in Endothelial Cell Shape

[+] Author and Article Information
Ronald P. Jean, Darren S. Gray, Alexander A. Spector, Christopher S. Chen

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205

J Biomech Eng 126(5), 552-558 (Nov 23, 2004) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1800559 History: Received May 26, 2004; Revised June 01, 2004; Online November 23, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Davies,  P. F., Barbee,  K. A., Volin,  M. V., Robotewskyj,  A., Chen,  J., Joseph,  L., Griem,  M. L., Wernick,  M. N., Jacobs,  E., Polacek,  D. C., dePaola,  N., and Barakat,  A. I., 1997, “Spatial Relationships in Early Signaling Events of Flow-Mediated Endothelial Mechanotransduction,” Annu. Rev. Physiol., 59, pp. 527–549.
Brighton,  C. T., Fisher,  J. R., Levine,  S. E., Corsetti,  J. R., Reilly,  T., Landsman,  A. S., Williams,  J. L., and Thibault,  L. E., 1996, “The Biochemical Pathway Mediating the Proliferative Response of Bone Cells to a Mechanical Stimulus,” Bone Joint Surg. A., Vol., 78, pp. 1337–1347.
Brownell,  W. E., Spector,  A. A., Raphael,  R. M., and Popel,  A. S., 2001, “Micro- and Nanomechanics of the Cochlear Outer Hair Cell,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.,3, pp. 169–194.
Gudi,  S., Nolan,  J. P., and Frangos,  J. A., 1998, “Modulation of GTPase Activity of G Proteins by Fluid Stress and Phospholipid Composition,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95, pp. 2616–2619.
Mathur,  A. B., Truskey,  G. A., and Reichert,  W. M., 2000, “Atomic Force and Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy for the Study of Force Transmission in Endothelial Cells,” Biophys. J., 78, pp. 1725–1735.
Mathur,  A. B., Truskey,  G. A., and Reichert,  W. M., 2000, “Total Internal Reflection Microscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy (TIRFM-AFM) to Study Stress Transduction Mechanisms in Endothelial Cells,” Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 28, pp. 197–202.
Juliano,  R. L., and Haskill,  S., 1993, “Signal Transduction From the Extracellular Matrix,” J. Cell Biol., 120, pp. 577–585.
Davies,  P. F., 1995, “Flow-Mediated Endothelial Mechanotransduction,” Physiol. Res., 75, pp. 519–560.
Maniotis,  A. J., Chen,  C. S., and Ingber,  D. E., 1997, “Demonstration of Mechanical Connections Between Integrins, Cytoskeletal Filaments, and Nucleoplasm That Stabilize Nuclear Structure,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 94, pp. 849–854.
Thomas,  C. H., Collier,  J. H., Sfeir,  C. S., and Healy,  K. E., 2002, “Engineering Gene Expression and Protein Synthesis by Modulation of Nuclear Shape,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99, pp. 1972–1977.
Chicurel,  M. E., Chen,  C. S., and Ingber,  D. E., 1998, “Cellular Control Lies in the Balance of Forces,” Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 10, pp. 232–239.
Tan,  J. L., Tien,  J., Pirone,  D. M., Gray,  D. S., Bhadriraju,  K., and Chen,  C. S., 2003, “Cells Lying on a bed of Microneedles: An Approach to Isolate Mechanical Force,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, pp. 1484–1489.
Lee,  J., Leonard,  M., Oliver,  T., Ishihara,  A., and Jacobson,  K., 1994, “Traction Forces Generated by Locomoting Keratocytes,” J. Cell Biol., 127, pp. 1957–1964.
Oliver,  T., Dembo,  M., and Jacobson,  K., 1995, “Traction Forces in Locomoting Cells,” Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 31, pp. 225–240.
Balaban,  N. Q., Schwarz,  U. S., Riveline,  D., Goichberg,  P., Tzur,  G., Sabanay,  I., Mahalu,  D., Safran,  S., Bershadsky,  A., Addadi,  L., and Geiger,  B., 2001, “Force and Focal Adhesion Assembly: A Close Relationship Studied Using Elastic Micropatterned Substrates,” Nat. Cell Biol., 3, pp. 466–472.
Wang,  H. B., Dembo,  M., Hanks,  S. K., and Wang,  Y.-L., 2001, “Focal Adhesion Kinase in Involved in Mechanosensing During Fibroblast Migration,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98, pp. 11295–11300.
Ingber,  D., 1997, “Tensegrity: The Architectural Basis of Cellular Mechanotransduction,” Annu. Rev. Physiol., 59, pp. 575–599.
Girard,  P. R., and Nerem,  R. M., 1995, “Shear Stress Modulates Endothelial Cell Morphology and F-Actin Organization Through the Regulation of Focal Adhesion-Associated Proteins,” J. Cell Physiol., 163, pp. 179–193.
Finer,  J. T., Simmons,  R. M., and Spudich,  J. A., 1994, “Single Myosin Molecule Mechanics: Piconewton Forces and Nanometre Steps,” Nature (London), 368, pp. 113–119.
Helmke,  B. P., Goldman,  R. D., and Davies,  P. F., 2000, “Rapid Displacement of Vimentin Intermediate Filaments in Living Endothelial Cells Exposed to Flow,” Circ. Res., 86, pp. 745–752.
Helmke,  B. P., Rosen,  A. B., and Davies,  P. F., 2003, “Mapping Mechanical Strain of an Endogenous Cytoskeletal Network in Living Endothelial Cells,” Biophys. J., 84, pp. 2691–2699.
Dembo,  M., Maltrud,  M., and Harlow,  F., 1986, “Numerical Studies of Unreactive Contractile Networks,” Biophys. J., 50, pp. 123–137.
Satcher,  R. L., and Dewey,  C. F., 1996, “Theoretical Estimates of Mechanical Properties of the Endothelial Cell Cytoskeleton,” Biophys. J., 71, pp. 109–118.
Boey,  S. K., Beal,  D. H., and Discher,  D. E., 1998, “Simulations of the Erythrocyte Cytoskeleton at Large Deformation. I. Microscopic Models,” Biophys. J., 75, pp. 1573–1583.
Hansen,  J. C., Skalak,  R., Chien,  S., and Hoger,  A., 1997, “Influence of Network Topology on the Elasticity of the Red Blood Cell Membrane Skeleton,” Biophys. J., 72, pp. 2369–2381.
Hansen,  J. C., Skalak,  R., Chien,  S., and Hoger,  A., 1997, “Spectrin Properties and the Elasticity of the Red Blood Cell Membrane Skeleton,” Biorheology, 34, pp. 327–348.
Civelekoglu,  G., and Edelstein-Keshet,  L., 1994, “Modelling the Dynamics of F-Actin in the Cell,” Bull. Math. Biol., 56, pp. 587–616.
Geigant,  E., Ladizhansky,  K., and Mogilner,  A., 1998, “An Integro-Differential Model for Orientational Distribution of F-Actin in Cells,” SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Appl. Math., 59, pp. 787–809.
Spector,  A. A., Ameen,  M., Charalambides,  P. G., and Popel,  A. S., 2002, “Nanostructure, Effective Properties, and Deformation Pattern of the Cochlear Outer Hair Cell Cytoskeleton,” J. Biomech. Eng., 124, pp. 180–187.
Guilak,  F., Tedrow,  J. R., and Burgkart,  R., 2000, “Viscoelastic Properties of the Cell Nucleus,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 269, pp. 781–786.
Caille,  N., Thoumine,  O., Tardy,  Y., and Meister,  J. J., 2002, “Contribution of the Nucleus to the Mechanical Properties of Endothelial Cells,” J. Biomech., 35, pp. 177–187.
Theret,  D. P., Levesque,  M. J., Sato,  M., Nerem,  R. M., and Wheeler,  L. T., 1988, “The Application of a Homogenous Half-Space Model in the Analysis of Endothelial Cell Micropipette Measurements,” J. Biomech. Eng., 110, pp. 190–199.
Shafrir,  Y., and Forgacs,  G., 2002, “Mechanotransduction Through the Cytoskeleton,” Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol., 282, pp. C479–C486.
Hazel,  A. L., and Pedley,  T. J., 2000, “Vascular Endothelial Cells Minimize the Total Force on Their Nuclei,” Biophys. J., 78, pp. 47–54.
Pienta,  K. J., and Coffey,  D. S., 1992, “Nuclear-Cytoskeletal Interactions: Evidence for Physical Connections Between the Nucleus and Cell Periphery and Their Alteration by Transformation,” J. Cell. Biochem., 49, pp. 357–365.
Sims,  J. R., Karp,  S., and Ingber,  D. E., 1992, “Altering the Cellular Mechanical Force Balance Results in Integrated Changes in Cell, Cytoskeletal and Nuclear Shape,” J. Cell. Sci., 103, pp. 1215–1222.
Ogden, R. W., 1997, Nonlinear Elastic Deformations, 2nd ed., Dover, Mineola.
Guilak,  F., 1995, “Compression-Induced Changes in the Shape and Volume of the Chondrocyte Nucleus,” J. Biomech., 28, pp. 1529–1541.
Harris,  A. K., Wild,  P., and Stopak,  D., 1980, “Silicone Rubber Substrata: a New Wrinkle in the Study of Cell Locomotion,” Science, 208, pp. 177–179.
Harris,  A. K., Stopak,  D., and Wild,  P., 1981, “Fibroblast Traction as a Mechanism for Collage Morphogenesis,” Nature (London), 290, pp. 249–251.
Burton,  K., and Taylor,  D. L., 1997, “Traction Forces of Cytokinesis Measured With Optically Modified Substrata,” Nature (London), 385, pp. 450–454.
Pelham,  R. J., and Wang,  Y.-L., 1997, “Cell Locomotion and Focal Adhesions are Regulated by Substrate Flexibility,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 94, pp. 13661–13665.
Beningo,  K. A., and Wang,  Y.-L., 2002, “Flexible Polyacrylamide Substrates for the Analysis of Mechanical Interactions at Cell-Substrate Adhesions,” Methods Cell Biol., 69, pp. 325–339.
Galbraith,  C. G., and Sheetz,  M. P., 1997, “A Micromachined Device Provides a New Bend on Fibroblast Traction Forces,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 94, pp. 9114–9118.
Reinhart-King,  C. A., Dembo,  M., and Hammer,  D. A., 2003, “Endothelial Cell Traction Forces on RGD-Derivatized Polyacrylamide Substrata,” Langmuir, 19, pp. 1573–1579.


Grahic Jump Location
Sketch of the projected nuclear and cell areas in the spread (dashed line) and round (solid line) states. Principal directions 1 and 2 correspond to the major and minor axes of the nucleus.
Grahic Jump Location
Representative phase-contrast images of the endothelial cell at time (a) t=0 s, and (b) t=180 s; and the corresponding processed images for (c) t=0 s, and (d) t=180 s. Adhesions were disrupted using a chemical treatment (trypsin).
Grahic Jump Location
Representative fluorescence images of the cell nuclei at time (a) t=0 s, and (b) t=180 s; and the corresponding processed images for (c) t=0 s, and (d) t=180 s
Grahic Jump Location
Nuclear stretch as a function of relative time for 0.006% (X ) and 0.017% (O ) of trypsin
Grahic Jump Location
Relative nuclear area change as a function of relative time for 0.006% (X ) and 0.017% (O ) of trypsin
Grahic Jump Location
Relative apparent adhesion area (projected area) change as a function of relative time for 0.017% trypsin (adhesion area ratio)
Grahic Jump Location
Ratio of the nuclear area ratio to the adhesion area ratio as a function of relative time for 0.017% trypsin
Grahic Jump Location
Conceptual sketch of the estimation of the forces deforming the nucleus during cell rounding. (A) and (b) preprocess of cell spreading; (a) cell in the round state, and (b) cell in the spread state where the nucleus is deformed by the cytoskeletal fibers. (C) and (d) process of cell rounding; (c) the reference (spread and prestressed state) and (d) the final round state (solid line), in order to reach the round state the forces (arrows) are applied to the nucleus in the spread state (dashed line); the forces are directed along the fibers that become inactivated during cell rounding, and they are opposite to those that extended the nucleus to its spread state in the preprocess.
Grahic Jump Location
The scheme to convert the stresses deforming the nucleus into a system of forces. In the model, the difference between the nuclear stresses in the final (round) and reference is analyzed, and the corresponding model forces appear as compressive. The application of these forces is equivalent to the effect of the loss of pretension. The contours of the projected areas of the nucleus in its spread and round states are given by the solid and dashed lines, respectively.
Grahic Jump Location
Nuclear stress, t, as a function of the relative volume change, J, and Poisson’s ratio, ν, corresponding to the round state
Grahic Jump Location
Nuclear stress, t, as a function of the relative volume change, J, and Poisson’s ratio, ν, corresponding to an intermediate state




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In