0
TECHNICAL PAPERS: Soft Tissues

Geometrical Stress-Reducing Factors in the Anisotropic Porcine Heart Valves

[+] Author and Article Information
X. Y. Luo

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK

W. G. Li

Hydraulic Machinery Division, Gansu University of Technology, 730050, Lanzhou, P.R. China

J. Li

School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 710049, Xi’an, P. R. China

J Biomech Eng 125(5), 735-744 (Oct 09, 2003) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1614821 History: Revised April 09, 2003; Online October 09, 2003; Received October 28, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Jamieson,  W. R. E., Burr,  L. H., Munro,  A. I., and Miyagishima,  R. T., 1998, “Carpenter-Edwards Standard Porcine Bioprosthesis: A 21-Year Experience,” Ann. Thorac. Surg., 66, pp. S40–43.
Ghista,  D. N., and Reul,  H., 1977, “Optimal Prosthetic Aortic Leaflet Valve; Design Parametric and Longevity Analysis: Development of the Avcothane-51 Leaflet Valve Based on the Optimal Design Analysis,” J. Biomech., 10, pp. 313–324.
Christine, C. W., and Medland, I. C., 1982, “A Nonlinear Finite-Element Stress Analysis of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve,” In: Finite Element in Biomechanics, Gallagher, R. H., Simon, B. R., Johnson, P. C., and Gross, J. F. eds., Chichester, Wiley, pp. 153–179.
Hamid,  M. S., Sabbah,  H. N., and Stein,  P. D., 1985, “Finite-Element Evaluation of Stresses on Closed Leaflets of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves With Flexible Stent,” Finite Elem. Anal. Design, 1, pp. 213–225.
Hamid,  M. S., Sabbah,  H. N., and Stein,  P. D., 1986, “Influence of Stent Height Upon Stresses on the Cusps of Closed Bioprosthetic Valves,” J. Biomech., 19, pp. 759–769.
Rousseau,  E. P. M., Sauren,  A. A. H. J., van Hout,  M. C., and van Steenhoven,  A. A., 1983, “Elastic and Viscoelastic Material Behavior of Fresh and Glutaraldehyde-Treated Porcine Aortic Valve Tissue,” J. Biomech., 16, pp. 339–348.
Huang,  X., Black,  M. M., Howard,  I. C., and Patterson,  E. A., 1990, “Two-Dimensional Finite-Element Analysis of a Bioprosthetic Heart Valve,” J. Biomech., 23, pp. 753–762.
Krucinski,  S., Vesely,  I., and Dokainish,  M. A., 1993, “Numerical Simulation of Leaflet Flexure in Bioprosthetic Heart Valves Mounted on Rigid and Expansible Stents,” J. Biomech., 26, pp. 929–943.
Black,  M. M., Howard,  I. C., Huang,  X., and Patterson,  E. A., 1991, “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of a Bioprosthetic Heart Valve,” J. Biomech., 24, pp. 793–801.
Patterson,  E. A., Howard,  I. C., and Thornton,  M. A., 1996, “A Comparative Study of Linear and Nonlinear Simulations of the Leaflets in a Bioprosthetic Heart Valve During Cardiac Cycle,” J. of Medical Engineering and Technology, 20, pp. 95–108.
Thornton,  M. A., Howard,  L. C., and Patterson,  E. A., 1997, “Three-Dimensional Stress Analysis of Polypropylene Leaflets for Prosthetic Heart Valves,” Med. Eng. Phys., 19, pp. 588–597.
Grande,  K. J., Cochran,  R. P., Reinhall,  P. G., and Kunzelman,  K. S., 1998, “Stress Variations in the Human Aortic Root and Valve: The Role of Anatomic Asymmetry,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 26, pp. 534–545.
Grande,  K. J., Cochran,  R. P., Reinhall,  P. G., and Kunzelman,  K. S., 1999, “Mechanisms of Aortic Root and Valve Incompetence in Aging: A Finite-Element Model,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 8, pp. 149–159.
De Hart,  J., Cacciola,  G., Schreurs,  P. J. G., and Peters,  G. W. M., 1998, “A Three-Dimensional Analysis of a Fiber-Reinforced Aortic Valve Prosthetics,” J. Biomech., 31, pp. 629–638.
Burriesci,  G., Howard,  I. C., and Patterson,  E. A., 1999, “The Stress/Strain and Fatigue Behavior of Glutaraldehyde Preserved Heart-Valve Tissue,” J. Biomech., 10, pp. 707–724.
Li,  J., Luo,  X. Y., and Kuang,  Z. B., 2001, “A Nonlnear Anisotropic Model for Porcine Aortic Heart Valves,” J. Biomech., 34, pp. 1279–1289.
Mavrilas,  D., and Missirlis,  Y., 1991, “An Approach to the Optimization of Preparation of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves,” J. Biomech., 24, pp. 331–339.
Mayne,  A. S. D., Christie,  G. M., Smaill,  B. H., Hunter,  P. J., and Barratt-Boyes,  B. G., 1989, “An Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Leaflets From Four Second-Generation Porcine Bioprosthese With Biaxial Testing Techniques,” J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 98, pp. 170–180.
Vesely,  I., 1998, “The Role of Elastin in Aortic Valve Mechanics,” J. Biomech., 31, pp. 115–123.
Vesely,  I., and Noseworthy,  R., 1992, “Micromechanics of the Fibrosa and the Ventricularis in Aortic Valve Leaflets,” J. Biomech., 25, pp. 101–113.
Vesely,  I., and Lozon,  A., 1993, “Natural Preload of Aortic Valve Leaflet Components During Glutaraldehyde Fixation: Effects on Tissue Mechanics,” J. Biomech., 26, pp. 121–131.
Vesely,  I., Boughner,  D. R., and Leesondietrich,  J., 1995, “Bioprosthetic Valve Tissue Viscoelasticity-Implications on Accelerated Pulse Duplicator Testing,” Ann. Thorac. Surg., 60, pp. S379.
Purinya,  B., and Kasyanov,  V., 1994, “Biomechanical and Structural Properties of the Explanted Bioprosthetic Valve Leaflets,” J. Biomech., 27, pp. 1–11.
Billiar,  K. L., and Sacks,  M. S., 2000a, “Biaxial Mechanical Properties of the Native and Glutaraldehyde Treated Aortic Valve Cusp: Part I-Experimental Results,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 122, pp. 23–30.
Billiar,  K. L., and Sacks,  M. S., 2000b, “Biaxial Mechanical Properties of the Native and Glutaraldehyde Treated Aortic Valve Cusp: Part II-A Structural Constitutive Model,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 122, pp. 327–335.
Sauran,  A. A. H., Kuijpers,  W., van Steenhoven,  A. A., and Veldpaus,  F. E., 1980, “Aortic Valve Histology and Its Relation With Mechanics-Preliminary Report,” J. Biomech., 13, pp. 97–104.
Clark,  R. E., and Finke,  E. H., 1974, “Scanning and Light Microscopy of Human Aortic Leaflets in Stressed and Relaxed States,” J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 67, pp. 792–803.
Milano,  A., Bortolotti,  U., Talenti,  E., Valfre,  C., Arbustini,  E., Valente,  M., Mazzucco,  A., Gallucci,  V., and Thiene,  G., 1984, “Calcific Degeneration as the Main Cause of Procine Bioprothetic Valve Faiture,” Am. J. Cardiol., 53, pp. 1066–1070.
Carpentier,  A., Dubost,  C., Lane,  E., Nashef,  A., Carpentier,  S., Relland,  J., Deloche,  A., Fabiani,  J. N., Chauvaud,  S., and Chauvaud,  S., 1982, “Continuing Improvements in Valvular Bioprostheses,” J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 83, pp. 27–42.
Makhijani,  V. B., Yang,  H. Q., Dionne,  P. J., and Thubrikar,  M. J., 1997, “Three-Dimensional Coupled Fluid-Structure Simulation of Pericardical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Function,” Peric. Aortic Valve Simulation, 43, pp. M387–392.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
The top view (left) and the side view (right) of the porcine valve leaflet. The leaflet takes the form of an elliptic paraboloid.
Grahic Jump Location
(left) The fibre orientations and (right) the finite element model (only half of the leaflet is computed) with 900 nodes. As three nodes are used along the shell thickness, there are three layers in the finite element model.
Grahic Jump Location
Representative stress-strain curves in the circumferential and radial directions for fresh porcine valve measured by Mavrilas & Missirlis 17. The stress-strain curve for the corresponding isotropic model is taken as the average of the two curves, as shown in the middle.
Grahic Jump Location
The variation in thickness of the porcine valves. The thickness counters are based on the measurements by Clark & Finke 27.
Grahic Jump Location
The stress contours for porcine valves with a uniform thickness. Top: longitudinal normal stress; middle: transverse normal stress; and bottom: in-plane shear stress. d=27.8 mm, h=19 mm. The values on the contours are given in kPa.
Grahic Jump Location
The longitudinal normal stress contours on the top surface of a porcine valves with uniform thickness for d=27.8 mm, and (a) h=14 mm, (b) h=19 mm, (c) h=24 mm, and (d) h=28 mm. The values on the contours are given in kPa.
Grahic Jump Location
The stress contours for porcine valves with a non-uniform thickness. Top: longitudinal normal stress; middle: transverse normal stress; and bottom: in-plane shear stress. d=27.8 mm,h=19 mm. The values on the contours are given in kPa.
Grahic Jump Location
The longitudinal normal stress contours on the top-surface of a porcine valve with the nonuniform thickness, and for d=27.8 mm, and (a) h=14 mm, (b) 19 mm, (c) 24 mm, and (d) 28 mm. The values on the contours are given in kPa.
Grahic Jump Location
The peak longitudinal normal stress versus the stent height for porcine valves with three different diameters. The solid curves are results from the anisotropic valves, and the dashed ones are for the corresponding isotropic valves.
Grahic Jump Location
The peak transverse normal stress versus the stent height for porcine valves with three different diameters. The solid curves are results from the anisotropic valves, and the dashed ones are for the corresponding isotropic valves.
Grahic Jump Location
The peak in-plane shear stress versus the stent height for porcine valves with three different diameters. The solid curves are results from the anisotropic valves, and the dashed ones are for the corresponding isotropic valves.
Grahic Jump Location
The variation of the area of the valve with the stent height for the three different diameters used

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In