TECHNICAL PAPERS: Fluids/Heat/Transport

A New Method for Evaluation of Cavitation Near Mechanical Heart Valves

[+] Author and Article Information
Peter Johansen

Bioengineering Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Sygehus, 8200 Aarhus N., Denmark

Keefe B. Manning

Bioengineering Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802

John M. Tarbell

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10031

Arnold A. Fontaine, Steven Deutsch

Applied Research Laboratory, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802

Hans Nygaard

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Sygehus, 8200 Aarhus N., Denmark

J Biomech Eng 125(5), 663-670 (Oct 09, 2003) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1613297 History: Received November 14, 2002; Revised April 17, 2003; Online October 09, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Yoganathan, A. P., 2000, “Cardiac Valve Prostheses” The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, J. Bronzino, editor, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 1847–1870.
Knapp, R. T., Daily, J. W., and Hammitt, F. G., 1970, Cavitation, 1st edition, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY, pp. 321–357.
Klepetko,  W., , 1989, “Leaflet Fracture in Edwards-Duromedics Bileaflet Valves,” J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 97(1), pp. 90–94.
Graf,  T., , 1991, “Cavitation Potential of Mechanical Heart-Valve Prostheses,” Int. J. Artif. Organs, 14(3), pp. 169–174.
Kafesjian,  R., , 1994, “Cavitation Damage of Pyrolytic Carbon in Mechanical Heart Valves,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 3 (Suppl 1:S2–7(S2–S7)), pp. 2–7.
Haubold,  A. D., Ely,  J. L., and Chahine,  G. L., 1994, “Effect of cavitation on pyrolytic carbon in vitro.,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 3(3), pp. 318–323.
Wu,  Z. J., , 1994, “The Closing Behavior of Medtronic Hall Mechanical Heart Valves,” ASAIO J., 40(3), pp. M702–M706.
Wu,  Z. J., Gao,  B. Z., and Hwang,  N. H., 1995, “Transient Pressure at Closing of a Monoleaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Prosthesis: Mounting Compliance Effect,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 4(5), pp. 553–567.
He,  Z., , 2001, “Mechanisms of Mechanical Heart-Valve Cavitation: Investigation Using a Tilting Disk-Valve Model,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 10(5), pp. 666–674.
Garrison,  L. A., , 1994, “An In-Vitro Investigation of Prosthetic Heart-Valve Cavitation in Blood,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 3 (Suppl 1:S8–22, discussion S22-4(S8–22)), pp. 8–24.
Johansen,  P., Lomholt,  M., and Nygaard,  H., 2002, “Spectral Characteristics of Mechanical Heart-Valve Closing Sounds,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 11(5), pp. 736–744.
Brennen, C. E., 1995, Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics, 1st edition, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, pp. 83–91.
Oba,  R., , 2002, “Stochastic Behavior (Randomness) of Desinent Cavitation,” J. Fluids Eng., 108(4), pp. 438–443.
Kini,  V., , 2000, “Flow Visualization in Mechanical Heart Valves: Occluder Rebound and Cavitation Potential,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 28(4), pp. 431–441.
Chandran,  K. B., and Aluri,  S., 1997, “Mechanical Valve Closing Dynamics: Relationship Between Velocity of Closing, Pressure Transients, and Cavitation Initiation,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 25(6), pp. 926–938.
Wu,  Z. J., Slonin,  J. H., and Hwang,  N. H., 1996, “Transient Pressure Signals in Mechanical Heart-Valve Cavitation,” ASAIO J., 42(5), pp. M555–M561.
Lee,  C. S., Chandran,  K. B., and Chen,  L. D., 1996, “Cavitation Dynamics of Medtronic Hall Mechanical Heart-Valve Prosthesis: Fluid Squeezing Effect,” J. Biomech. Eng., 118(1), pp. 97–105.
Herman,  B. A., and Carey,  R. F., 1994, “A Protocol for the Evaluation of the Cavitation Potential of Mechanical Heart Valves,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 3 [Suppl 1:S128–30, discussion S130–2(S128–S130)], pp. 128–132.
Dawson, B., and Trapp, R. G., 2001, Basic & Clinical Biostatistics, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Singapore.
Donnerstein,  R. L., and Allen,  H. D., 1990, “Asynchronous Leaflet Closure in the Normally Functioning Bileaflet mechanical valve,” Am. Heart J., 119(3 Pt 1), pp. 694–697.
Kingsbury,  C., , 1993, “Cavitation Threshold With Respect to dP/dt: Evaluation in 29 mm Bileaflet, Pyrolitic Carbon Heart Valves,” Int. J. Artif. Organs, 16(7), pp. 515–520.
Shu,  M. C., , 1994, “In Vitro Observations of Mechanical Heart-Valve Cavitation,” J. Heart Valve Dis., 3 [Suppl 1:S85–92, discussion S92–3(S85–S92)], pp. 85–93.


Grahic Jump Location
The top three schematics of the investigated valves show areas (shaded) of highest probability to find cavitation. The transducer position is illustrated as the dark shaded rectangle on the atrial aspect with the wire leaving. Below the schematics are three photographs which visualizes the cavitation.
Grahic Jump Location
The different dp/dt obtained for the different investigated valves. The mean dp/dt±standard deviation was 2926±1183,2286±824, and 2585±1296 mmHg/s for the Björk-Shiley, CarboMedics, and Medtronic Hall, respectively.
Grahic Jump Location
Images acquired at different loading rates. The data are divided in three degrees of cavitation based on visual judgments and criteria. Only frames with visual cavitation are shown, except for the non-cavitation category. Each frame represents 1/3 msec. Successive frames are shown with time increasing downward. Contrast and brightness of the images have been adjusted to enhance details.
Grahic Jump Location
The spectra calculated are the total energy spectrum, the deterministic energy spectrum calculated from the ensemble average signal, and the non-deterministic spectrum being the difference between the total and the deterministic energy spectrum. Legends Light gray: Total energy density spectrum; Dark gray: Deterministic energy density spectrum; Black: Non-deterministic energy density spectrum.
Grahic Jump Location
The non-deterministic energy and dp/dt plotted as a function of the cavitation degree based on the visual criteria for the three valves investigated.
Grahic Jump Location
The non-deterministic energy plotted as a function of dp/dt for the three valves. Björk-Shiley r2=0.74; CarboMedics r2=0.99: Medtronic Hall r2=0.56.
Grahic Jump Location
The RMS value of the high-pass filtered pressure data is plotted as a function of non-deterministic energy for the three valves. The high-pass filter is designed based on a priori knowledge of the particular valve’s mechanical resonance characteristic. Björk-Shiley valve r2=0.99; CarboMedics valve r2=0.98; Medtronic Hall valve r2=0.88.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In