0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Predicting the Failure Response of Cement-Bone Constructs Using a Non-Linear Fracture Mechanics Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
Kenneth A. Mann, Leatha A. Damron

Musculoskeletal Sciences Research Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210

J Biomech Eng 124(4), 462-470 (Jul 30, 2002) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1488167 History: Received January 01, 2001; Revised March 01, 2002; Online July 30, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Robinson,  R. P., Lovell,  T. P., Green,  T. M., and Bailey,  G. A., 1989, “Early Femoral Component Loosening in DF-80 Total Hip Arthroplasty,” J. Arthroplasty, 4(1), pp. 55–64.
Jasty,  M., Maloney,  W. J., Bragdon,  C. R., Haire,  T., and Harris,  W. H., 1990, “Histomorphological Studies of the Long-Term Skeletal Responses to Well Fixed Cemented Femoral Components,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., 72B(8), pp. 1220–1229.
Hori,  R. Y., and Lewis,  J. L., 1982, “Mechanical Properties of the Fibrous Tissue Found at the Bone-Cement Interface following Total Joint Replacement,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 16(6), pp. 911–927.
Huiskes,  R., Verdonschot,  N., and Nivbrant,  B., 1998, “Migration, Stem Shape, and Surface Finish in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Clin. Orthop., 355, pp. 103–112.
Herman,  J. H., Sowder,  W. G., Anderson,  D., Appel,  A. M., and Hopson,  C. N., 1989, “Polymethylmethacrylate-Induced Release of Bone-Resorbing Factors,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., 71-A(10), pp. 1530–1541.
Horowitz,  S. M., Doty,  S. B., Lane,  J. M., and Burstein,  A. H., 1993, “Studies of the Mechanism by which the Mechanical Failure of Polymethylmethacrylate leads to Bone Resorption,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., 75-A(6), pp. 802–813.
Dohmae,  Y., Bechtold,  J. E., and Sherman,  R. E., 1988, “Reduction in Cement-Bone Interface Shear Strength between Primary and Revision Arthroplasty,” Clin. Orthop., 236, pp. 214–240.
Bean,  D. J., Hollis,  J. M., Woo,  S. L.-Y., and Convery,  F. R., 1988, “Sustained Pressurization of Polymethylmethacrylate: A Comparison of Low- and Moderate-Viscosity Bone Cements,” J. Orthop. Res., 6(4), pp. 580–584.
Köbel, R., Bergmann, G., and Boenick, U., 1976, Mechanical Engineering of the Cement-Bone Bond, Engineering in Medicine, M. Schldach and D. Hohman, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 347–357.
Wang,  X., and Agrawal,  C. M., 2000, “A Mixed Mode Fracture Toughness Test of Bone-Biomaterial Interfaces,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 53(6), pp. 664–672.
Clech,  J. P., Keer,  L. M., and Lewis,  J. L., 1985, “A Model of Tension and Compression Cracks with Cohesive Zone at a Bone-Cement Interface,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 107(2), pp. 175–182.
Kanninen, M. F., and Popelar, C. H., 1985, Advanced Fracture Mechanics, Oxford University Press, New York.
Mann,  K. A., Werner,  F. W., and Ayers,  D. C., 1997, “Modeling the Tensile Behavior of the Cement-Bone Interface,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 119(2), pp. 175–178.
Mann,  K. A., Allen,  M. J., and Ayers,  D. C., 1998, “Pre-Yield and Post-Yield Shear Behavior of the Cement-Bone Interface,” J. Orthop. Res., 16(3), pp. 370–378.
Broek, D., 1991, Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Harrigan,  T. P., and Harris,  W. H., 1991, “A Three-Dimensional Non-Linear Finite Element Study of the Effect of Element-Prosthesis Debonding in Cemented Femoral Total Hip Components,” J. Biomech., 24(1), pp. 1047–1058.
Brown,  T. D., Pedersen,  D. R., Radin,  E. L., and Rose,  R. M., 1988, “Global Mechanical Consequences of Reduced Cement/Bone Coupling Rigidity in Proximal Femoral Arthroplasty: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis,” J. Biomech., 21(2), pp. 115–129.
Verdonschot,  N., and Huiskes,  R., 1996, “Mechanical Effects of Stem-Cement Interface Characteristics on Total Hip Replacement,” Clin. Orthop., 329, pp. 326–336.
Mann,  K. A., Ayers,  D. C., Werner,  F. W., Nicoletta,  R. J., and Fortino,  M. D., 1997, “Tensile Strength of the Cement-Bone Interface Depends on the Amount of Bone Interdigitated with PMMA Cement,” J. Biomech., 30(4), pp. 339–346.
Lotz,  J. C., Gerhart,  T. N., and Hayes,  W. C., 1990, “Mechanical Properties of the Trabecular Bone from the Proximal Femur: A Quantitative CT Study,” J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 14, pp. 107–114.
Mann,  K. A., Werner,  F. W., and Ayers,  D. C., 1999, “Mechanical Strength of the Cement-Bone Interface is Greater in Shear than in Tension,” J. Biomech., 32(11), pp. 1251–1254.
Lewis,  G., 1997, “Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement: State of the Art Review,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 38(2), pp. 155–82.
Mow, V. C., and Hayes, W. C., 1991, Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Raven Press, New York.
Wong, P. C. W., Kulhawy, F. H., and Ingraffea, A. R., 1989, “Numerical Modeling of Interface Behavior for Drilled Shaft Foundations under Generalized Loading,” Foundation Engineering: Current Principles and Practices, F. H. Kulhawy, ed., ASCE, New York, pp. 565–579.
Keaveny,  T. M., and Bartel,  D. L., 1994, “Fundamental Load Transfer Patterns for Press-Fit, Surface-Treated Intra-Medullary Fixation Stems,” J. Biomech., 27(9), pp. 1147–1158.
Mann,  K. A., Bartel,  D. L., Wright,  T. M., and Burstein,  A. H., 1995, “Coulomb Frictional Interfaces in Modelling Cemented Total Hip Replacements: A More Realistic Model,” J. Biomech., 28(9), pp. 1067–1078.
Boone,  T. J., Wawrzynek,  P. A., and Ingraffea,  A. R., 1986, “Simulation of the Fracture Process in Rock with Application to Hydrofracturing,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 23(3), pp. 255–265.
Maher, S. A., and McCormack, B. A. O., 1999, “Quantification of Interdigitation at Bone Cement/Cancellous Bone Interfaces in Cemented Femoral Reconstructions,” Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, 213, pp. 347–354.
Lotz,  J., Cheal,  E., and Hayes,  W., 1991, “Fracture Prediction for the Proximal Femur using Finite Element Models: Part II-Nonlinear analysis,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 113(4), pp. 361–365.
Keyak,  J., Rossi,  S., Jones,  K., and Skinner,  H., 1998, “Prediction of Femoral Fracture Load using Automated Finite Element Modelling,” J. Biomech., 31(2), pp. 125–133.
Silva,  M., Keaveny,  T., and Hayes,  W., 1998, “Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Analysis Predicts Failure Loads and Fracture Patterns for Vertebral Sections,” J. Orthop. Res., 16(3), pp. 300–308.
Keaveny,  T. M., and Hayes,  W. C., 1993, “A 20-year Perspective on the Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 115(4B), pp. 534–542.
Fenech,  C. M., and Keaveny,  T. M., 1999, “A Cellular Solid Criterion for Predicting the Axial-Shear Failure Properties of Bovine Trabecular Bone,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 121(4), pp. 414–422.
Majkowski,  R. S., Miles,  A. W., Bannister,  G. C., Perkins,  J., and Taylor,  G. J. S., 1993, “Bone Surface Preparation in Cemented Joint Replacement,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., 75B(3), pp. 459–463.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Experimental (a) and computational models with frontal (b) and oblique side (c) views of the bone-cement section. For a scale reference, the loading pin had a diameter of 6.35 millimeters
Grahic Jump Location
Interface elements were assigned piece-wise linear constitutive models for both normal direction (a) and shear direction (b) loading
Grahic Jump Location
Tensile strength (a), shear strength (b), tensile fracture toughness (c), and shear fracture toughness (d) results as a function of quantity of interdigitated bone. These relationships were used to assign interface parameters in the present study based on previous data of simple tension and shear specimens 21. Linear regression results with 99 percent confidence intervals of the mean and slope are shown
Grahic Jump Location
Typical load versus displacement plot for an experimental test and finite element model
Grahic Jump Location
Displacement behavior of the experiment and corresponding finite element models at peak load (ultimate) in the softening region and at final failure
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between experimental measurements and finite element predictions for the eight test specimens. Results for ultimate load (a), energy to failure (b) and displacement at 50 percent of the ultimate load (c) are shown. Error bars represent results for models using interface parameters determined at +99 percent confidence intervals for interface strength and fracture toughness (see Fig. 4). A regression line for the experiment versus finite element prediction is shown as a solid line. The dotted line indicates a perfect correspondence (unity slope) between experiment and finite element results
Grahic Jump Location
Parametric finite element studies of the cement-bone structures where interface strength (a) and interface fracture toughness (b) were modified from nominal values in the interface element models. The 99 percent confidence interval values shown in Fig. 3 were used in place of nominal values for each case

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In