0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Competing Effects of Buckling and Anchorage Strength on Optimal Wheat Stalk Geometry

[+] Author and Article Information
Tony Farquhar, Jiang Zhou, William H. Wood

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21250

J Biomech Eng 124(4), 441-449 (Jul 30, 2002) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1488934 History: Received August 01, 2000; Revised April 01, 2002; Online July 30, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Allan,  R. E., 1989, “Agronomic Comparison Between Rht1 and Rht2 Semidwarf Genes in Winter Wheat,” Crop Science, 29, pp. 1103–1108.
Gent, M. P. N., and Kiyomoto, R. K., 1998, “Physiological and Agronomic Consequences of Rht Genes in Wheat,” Crop Sciences: Recent Advances, The Hawthorn Press.
Fischer,  R. A., and Stapper,  M., 1987, “Lodging Effects on High-yielding Crops of Irrigated Semidwarf Wheat,” Field Crops Research, 17, pp. 245–258.
Crook,  M. J., and Ennos,  A. R., 1994, “Stem and Root Characteristics Associated With Lodging Resistance in Four Winter Wheat Cultivars,” J. Agric. Sci. 123, pp. 167–174.
Crook,  M. J., and Ennos,  A. R., 1993, “The Mechanics of Root Lodging in Winter Wheat, Triticum aestivum L.,” Journal of Experimental Botany, 44, pp. 1219–1224.
Heisey, P. W., Aquino, P., Hernandez, V., and Rice, E., 1996, “Part 2: The Current World Wheat Situation,” CIMMYT 1995/96 World Wheat Facts and Trends, Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
Lersten, N. R., 1987, “Morphology and Anatomy of the Wheat Plant,” Wheat and Wheat Improvement, American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and Crop Science Society of America, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc..
Niklas, K. J., 1992, Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function. The University of Chicago Press.
Speck,  T., Spatz,  H. C., and Vogellehner,  D., 1990, “Contributions to the Biomechanics of Plants, I. Stabilities of Plant Stems with Strengthening Elements of Different Cross-sections Against Weight and Wind Forces,” Botanica Acta, 103, pp. 111–122.
Farquhar,  T., and Meyer-Phillips,  H., 2001, “Relative Safety Factors Against Global Buckling, Anchorage Rotation, and Tissue Rupture in Wheat,” J. Theor. Biol., 211, pp. 55–65.
Schulgasser,  K., and Witztum,  A., 1992, “On the Strength, Stiffness and Stability of Tubular Plant Stems and Leaves,” J. Theor. Biol., 155, pp. 497–515.
Davenport, A. G., and Novak, M., 1996, “Vibration of Structures Induced by Wind,” Shock and Vibration Handbook, McGraw-Hill.
Niklas,  K. J., 1993, “Influence of Tissue Density-specific Mechanical Properties on the Scaling of Plant Height,” Annals of Botany, 72, pp. 173–179.
Biddington,  N. L., 1986, “The Effects of Mechanically-induced Stress in Plants—A review,” Plant Growth Regulation, 4, pp. 103–123.
Jaffe,  M. J., and Forbes,  S., 1993, “Thigmomorphogenesis: The Effect of Mechanical Perturbation on Plants,” Plant Growth Regulation, 12, pp. 313–324.
Mitchell,  C. A., and Myers,  P. N., 1995, “Mechanical Stress Regulation of Plant Growth and Development,” Horticultural Reviews, 17, pp. 1–42.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K., 1995, Scaling. Why is Animal Size so Important? Cambridge University Press.
Steiner, U., and Schoenbeck, F., 1995, “Induced Disease Resistance in Monocots,” Induced Resistance to Disease in Plants, Kluwer Acad Publ, Boston.
Karam,  G. N., and Gibson,  L. J., 1995, “Elastic Buckling of Cylindrical Shells With Elastic Cores-I. Analysis,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 32(8), pp. 1259–1283.
Niklas,  K. J., 1990, “The Mechanical Significance of Clasping Leaf Sheaths in Grasses: Evidence From Two Cultivars of Avena sativa,” Ann. Bot. (London), 65, pp. 505–512.
McNeil,  M., Darvill,  A. G., and Fry,  S. C., 1984, “Structure and Function of the Primary Cell Wall of Plants,” Annu. Rev. Biochem., 53, pp. 625–663.
van Beem,  J., Farquhar,  T., Meyer,  H., Reynolds,  M. P., Singh,  R., and van Ginkel,  M., 1998, “Influence of the Rht Dwarfing Genes on Stem Morphology, Biochemistry, and Biomechanics and Associated Lodging Effects in Wheat,” In 9th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Saskatchewan, Canada, 22, pp. 366–369.
Farquhar, T., Zhou, J., and Meyer, H., 2001, “Rht1 Dwarfing Gene Selectively Decreases the Material Stiffness of Wheat,” J. Biomech., in Press.
Rao, S. S., 1995, Mechanical Vibrations. Addison-Wesley.
Niklas,  K. J., and Moon,  F. C., 1988, “Flexural Stiffness and Modulus of Elasticity of Flower Stalks from Allium sativum as Measured by Multiple Resonance Frequency Spectra,” Am. J. Bot., 75, pp. 1517–1525.
Zebrowski,  J., 1999, “Dynamic Behavior of Inflorescence-bearing Triticale and Triticum Stems,” Planta, 207, pp. 410–417.
Farquhar,  T., Wood,  J. Z., and van Beem,  J., 2000, “The Kinematics of Wheat Struck by a Wind Gust,” J. Appl. Mech., 67, pp. 496–502.
McClung,  A. M., Cantrell,  R. G., Quick,  J. S., and Gregory,  R. S., 1986, “Influence of the Rht1 Semidwarf Gene on Yield, Yield Components, and Grain Protein in Durum Wheat,” Crop Science, 26, pp. 1095–1099.
Zadoks,  J. C., Chang,  T. T., and Konzak,  C. F., 1974, “A Decimal Code for the Growth Stages of Cereals,” Weed Research, 14, pp. 415–421.
Spatz,  H.-Ch., and Speck,  T., 1994, “Local Buckling and Other Modes of Failure in Hollow Plant Stems,” Biomimetics, 2, pp. 149–173.
Baker,  C. J., 1995, “The Development of a Theoretical Model for the Windthrow of Plants,” J. Theor. Biol., 175, pp. 355–372.
Ennos,  R., 1991, “The Mechanics of Anchorage in Wheat Triticum aestivum L.” Journal of Experimental Botany, 42(245), pp. 1601–1613.
Papalambros P. Y., 1991, Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation. Cambridge University Press.
MATLAB, 1996, The Language of Technical Computing. The MathWorks.
Drysdale, A. E., Hanford, A. J., and Ewert, M. K., 1998, “Advanced Life Support Systems Modeling and Analysis Project. Baseline Values and Assumptions Document,” NASA Technical Report. CTSD-ADV-383.
Hobbs P. R., Sayre, K. D., and Ortiz-Monasterio, J. I., 1998, “Increasing Wheat Yields Sustainably Through Agronomic Means,” Technical Report, NRG Paper 98-01, Mexico, D.F., Mexico, 1998.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Wheat stem geometry can be idealized as a series of cojoined cylinders (or internodes) of varying diameter separated by solid bulkheads (or nodes). A typical wheat stem has 5 to 8 such internodes of length Li, outer diameter Di, and wall thickness Ti. The mid-internode dimensions were obtained using standard measuring instruments. The presence of the nodes has a negligibly small influence on stem flexural stiffness.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted optimal stalk resonant frequency as a function of lateral forcing frequency, for a) two peak force intensities or b) two stem lengths. All simulations assumed fixed anchorage strength Mc and a) fixed stem length Lt, or b) fixed peak force intensity fo.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted optimal resonant frequency as a function of anchorage strength, for two peak force intensities, with fixed forcing frequency ωf and stem length Lt.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted optimal resonant frequency as a function of peak force intensity, for two stem lengths, with fixed anchorage strength and forcing frequency.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted optimal stem cross section for a) three resonant frequencies, or b) three stem lengths. The right side shows the outer mid-point of each segment comprising the stem wall and the left side shows the stepped cross section for one a) resonant frequency, or b) stem length, only. Refer to text for further explanation.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted optimal (right side) or observed (left side) stem geometry of two varieties of wheat. In a) the actual stem geometry of an elite semidwarf variety called Kauz (Rht1) (n=6) is contrasted to the predicted optimum for three material property Cases. In b) the actual geometry of a nearly isogenic tall research cross designated Kauz (rht) is contrasted to the predicted optimum. The three Cases are described in the text.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted optimal stem mass as a function of anchorage strength. In a) the lower (L) and upper (U) solution branches are shown for two stem lengths with fixed peak force intensity and forcing frequency ωf=1.0 Hz. In b) the optimal stem mass is shown in the lower branch only for two peak force intensities with fixed stem length and forcing frequency ωf=0.4 Hz.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted optimal stem mass as a function of forcing frequency for a) two stem lengths, or b) two peak force intensities, with fixed anchorage strength. The points labeled a) A-A or b) B-B are equal mass lower and upper solutions, and represent stalks with resonant frequencies either below or above the forcing frequency, respectively.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted optimal stem mass as a function of resonant frequency for two stem lengths, either a) Lt=0.5 m, or b) Lt=0.7 m, for all three material property Cases.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted optimal stem geometry based on m=25 starting vectors for Case 1, with fixed stem length and resonant frequency. Analytical solutions for a uniform rod and a smoothly tapered tube are shown for comparison. The bandwidth δ is a measure of model uncertainty, which was addressed using a multi-tiered scheme to identify the most suitable starting vector.

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In