A New In Vitro Model to Evaluate Differential Responses of Endothelial Cells to Simulated Arterial Shear Stress Waveforms

[+] Author and Article Information
Brett R. Blackman, Guillermo Garcı́a-Cardeña, Michael A. Gimbrone

Center for Excellence in Vascular Biology, and Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115

J Biomech Eng 124(4), 397-407 (Jul 30, 2002) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1486468 History: Received December 01, 2001; Revised April 01, 2002; Online July 30, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Nichols, W. W., O’Rourke, M. F., Hartley, C., and McDonald, D. A., 1998, McDonald’s Blood Flow In Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental, and Clinical Principles, Oxford Press, New York.
Davies,  P. F., 1995, “Flow-mediated Endothelial Mechanotransduction,” Physiol. Rev., 75(3), pp. 519–560.
Traub,  O., and Berk,  B. C., 1998, “Laminar Shear Stress: Mechanisms by Which Endothelial Cells Transduce an Atheroprotective Force,” Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol., 18(5), pp. 677–685.
Haidekker,  M. A., L’Heureux,  N., and Frangos,  J. A., 2000, “Fluid Shear Stress Increases Membrane Fluidity in Endothelial Cells: A Study with DCVJ Fluorescence,” Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 278(4), pp. H1401–H1406.
Jalali,  S., del Pozo,  M. A., Chen,  K., Miao,  H., Li,  Y., Schwartz,  M. A., Shyy,  J. Y., and Chien,  S., 2001, “Integrin-mediated Mechanotransduction Requires its Dynamic Interaction With Specific Extracellular Matrix Ligands,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98(3), pp. 1042–1046.
Dewey,  C. F., Bussolari,  S. R., Gimbrone,  M. A., and Davies,  P. F., 1981, “The Dynamic Response of Vascular Endothelial Cells to Fluid Shear Stress,” J. Biomech. Eng., 103(3), pp. 177–185.
Helmlinger,  G., Geiger,  R. V., Schreck,  S., and Nerem,  R. M., 1991, “Effects of Pulsatile Flow on Cultured Vascular Endothelial Cell Morphology,” J. Biomech. Eng., 113(2), pp. 123–131.
Girard,  P. R., and Nerem,  R. M., 1995, “Shear Stress Modulates Endothelial Cell Morphology and f-actin Organization Through the Regulation of Focal Adhesion-associated Proteins,” J. Cell Physiol., 163, pp. 179–193.
Thoumine,  O., Nerem,  R. M., and Girard,  P. R., 1995, “Oscillatory Shear Stress and Hydrostatic Pressure Modulate Cell-matrix Attachment Proteins in Cultured Endothelial Cells,” In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology, Animal, 31(1), pp. 45–54.
DePaola,  N., Gimbrone,  M. A. , Davies,  P. F., and Dewey,  C. F., 1992, “Vascular Endothelium Responds to Fluid Shear Stress Gradients [published erratum appears in Arterioscler Thromb 1993 Mar; 13 (3) p. 465],” Arterioscler. Thromb., 12(11), pp. 1254–1257.
Davies,  P. F., Remuzzi,  A., Gordon,  E. J., Dewey,  C. F., and Gimbrone,  M. A., 1986, “Turbulent Fluid Shear Stress Induces Vascular Endothelial Cell Turnover In Vitro,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 83(7), pp. 2114–2117.
Noris,  M., Morigi,  M., Donadelli,  R., Aiello,  S., Foppolo,  M., Todeschini,  M., Orisio,  S., Remuzzi,  G., and Remuzzi,  A., 1995, “Nitric Oxide Synthesis by Cultured Endothelial Cells is Modulated by Flow Conditions,” Circ. Res., 76(4), pp. 536–543.
Topper,  J., Cai,  J., Falb,  D., and Gimbrone,  M. A., 1996, “Identification of Vascular Endothelial Genes Differentially Responsive to Fluid Mechanical Stimuli: Cyclooxygenase-2, Manganese Superoxide Dismutase, and Endothelial Cell Nitric Oxide Synthase are Selectively Up-regulated by Steady Laminar Shear Stress,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98, pp. 10417–10422.
Garcia-Cardena,  G., Comander,  J., Anderson,  K. R., Blackman,  B. R., and Gimbrone,  M. A., 2001, “Biomechanical Activation of Vascular Endothelium as a Determinant of its Functional Phenotype,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98(8), pp. 4478–4485.
Gimbrone,  M. A. J., Topper,  J. N., Nagel,  T., Anderson,  K. R., and Garcia-Cardena,  G., 2000, “Endothelial Dysfunction, Hemodynamic Forces, and Atherogenesis,” Ann NY Acad Sci, 902, pp. 230–239.
Moore,  J. E., Burki,  E., Suciu,  A., Zhao,  S., Burnier,  M., Brunner,  H. R., and Meister,  J. J., 1994, “A Device for Subjecting Vascular Endothelial Cells to Both Fluid Shear Stress and Circumferential Cyclic Stretch,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 22(4), pp. 416–422.
Peng,  X., Recchia,  F. A., Byrne,  B. J., Wittstein,  I. S., Ziegelstein,  R. C., and Kass,  D. A., 2000, “In Vitro System to Study Realistic Pulsatile Flow and Stretch Signaling in Cultured Vascular Cells,” Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 279, pp. C797–C805.
Qiu,  Y., and Tarbell,  J. M., 2000, “Interaction Between Wall Shear Stress and Circumferential Strain Affects Endothelial Cell Biochemical Production,” J. Vasc. Res., 37(3), pp. 147–157.
Langille,  B. L., 1984, “Integrity of Arterial Endothelium Following Acute Exposure to High Shear Stress,” Biorheology, 21, pp. 333–346.
Schnittler,  H. J., Franke,  R. P., Akbay,  U., Mrowietz,  C., and Drenckhahn,  D., 1993, “Improved In Vitro Rheological System for Studying the Effect of Fluid Shear Stress on Cultured Cells,” Am. J. Physiol., 265(1 Pt 1), pp. C289–298.
Blackman,  B. R., Barbee,  K. A., and Thibault,  L. E., 2000, “In Vitro Cell Shearing Device to Investigate the Dynamic Response of Cells in a Controlled Hydrodynamic Environment,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 28(4), pp. 363–372.
Maier,  S. E., Meier,  D., Boesiger,  P., Moser,  U. T., and Vieli,  A., 1989, “Human Abdominal Aorta: Comparative Measurements of Blood Flow with MR Imaging and Multigated Doppler US.,” Radiology, 171(2), pp. 487–492.
Oshinski,  J. N., Ku,  D. N., Mukundan,  S. J., Loth,  F., and Pettigrew,  R. I., 1995, “Determination of Wall Shear Stress in the Aorta With the Use of MR Phase Velocity Mapping,” J. Magn. Reson Imaging, 5(6), pp. 640–647.
Oyre,  S., Pedersen,  E. M., Ringgaard,  S., Boesiger,  P., and Paaske,  W. P., 1997, “In Vivo Wall Shear Stress Measured by Magnetic Resonance Velocity Mapping in the Normal Human Abdominal Aorta,” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc Surg., 13(3), pp. 263–271.
Ling,  S. C., Atabek,  H. B., Letzing,  W. G., and Patel,  D. J., 1973, “Nonlinear Analysis of Aortic Flow in Living Dogs,” Circ. Res., 33(2), pp. 198–212.
Ling,  S. C., and Atabek,  H. B., 1972, “A Nonlinear Analysis of Pulsatile Flow in Arteries,” J. Fluid Mech., 55, pp. 493–511.
Dunn, G. A., 1983, Characterizing a Kinesis Response: Time Averaged Measures of Cell Speed and Directional Persistence. Leukocyte Locomotion and Chemotaxis, H. O. Keller and G. O. Till. Basel, Birkhauser: pp. 14–33.
Ku,  D. N., Giddens,  D. P., Zarins,  C. K., and Glagov,  S., 1985, “Pulsatile Flow and Atherosclerosis in the Human Carotid Bifurcation. Positive Correlation Between Plaque Location and Low Oscillating Shear Stress,” Arteriosclerosis (Dallas), 5(3), pp. 293–302.
Moore,  J. E. J., Xu,  C., Glagov,  S., Zarins,  C. K., and Ku,  D. N., 1994, “Fluid Wall Shear Stress Measurements in a Model of the Human Abdominal Aorta: Oscillatory Behavior and Relationship to Atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis (Dallas), 110(2), pp. 225–240.
Fewell,  M. E., and Hellums,  J. D., 1977, “The Secondary Flow of Newtonian Fluids in a Cone-and-Plate Viscometers,” Trans. Soc. Rheol., 21, pp. 535–565.
Sdougos,  H. P., Bussolari,  S. R., and Dewey,  C. F., 1984, “Secondary Flow and Turbulence in a Cone-and-Plate Device,” J. Fluid Mech., 138, pp. 379–404.
Silkworth,  J. B., and Stephbens,  W. E., 1975, “The Shape of Endothelial Cells in en face Preparations of Rabbit Blood Vessels,” Angiology, 26, pp. 474–487.
Langille,  B. L., and Adamson,  S. L., 1981, “Relationship Between Blood Flow Direction and Endothelial Orientation at Arterial Branch Sites in Rabbits and Mice,” Circ. Res., 48, pp. 481–488.
Burridge,  K., Molony,  L., and Kelly,  T., 1987, “Adhesion Plaques: Sites of Transmembrane Interaction Between the Extracellular Matrix and the Actin Cytoskeleton,” J. Cell Sci. Suppl., 8, pp. 211–229.
Girard,  P. R., and Nerem,  R. M., 1993, “Endothelial Cell Signaling and Cytoskeletal Changes in Response to Shear Stress,” Front Med. Biol. Eng., 5(1), pp. 31–36.
Galbraith,  C. G., Skalak,  R., and Chien,  S., 1998, “Shear Stress Induces Spatial Reorganization of the Endothelial Cell Cytoskeleton,” Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 40(4), pp. 317–330.
Rubanyi,  G. M., Romero,  J. C., and Vanhoutte,  P. M., 1986, “Flow-induced Release of Endothelium-Derived Relaxing Factor,” Am. J. Physiol., 250, pp. H1145–H1149.
Nishida,  K., Harrison,  P. G., Navas,  J. P., Fisher,  A. A., Dockery,  S. P., Uematsu,  M., Nerem,  R. M., Alexander,  R. W., and Murphy,  T. J., 1992, “Molecular Cloning and Characterization of the Constitutive Bovine Aortic Endothelial Cell Nitric Oxide Synthase,” J. Clin. Invest., 90(5), pp. 2092–2096.
Kuchan,  M. J., and Frangos,  J. A., 1994, “Role of Calcium and Calmodulin in Flow-Induced Nitric Oxide Production in Endothelial cells,” Am. J. Physiol., 266(3 Pt 1), pp. C628–636.
Sessa,  W. C., Pritchard,  K., Seyedi,  N., Wang,  J., and Hintze,  T., 1994, “Chronic Exercise in Dogs Increases Coronary Vascular Nitric Oxide Production and Endothelial Cell Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Expression,” Circ. Res., 74(2), pp. 349–353.
Davis,  M. E., Cai,  H., Drummond,  G. R., and Harrison,  D. G., 2001, “Shear Stress Regulates Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression Through C-src by Divergent Signaling Pathways,” Circ. Res., 89, pp. 1073–1080.
Helmlinger,  G., Berk,  B. C., and Nerem,  R. M., 1995, “Calcium Responses of Endothelial Cell Monolayers Subjected to Pulsatile and Steady Laminar Flow Differ,” Am. J. Physiol., 269(2 Pt 1), pp. C367–375.
Dieterich,  P., Odenthal-Schnittler,  M., Mrowietz,  C., Kramer,  M., Sasse,  L., Oberleithner,  H., and Schnittler,  H. J., 2000, “Quantitative Morphodynamics of Endothelial Cells Within Confluent Cultures in Response to Fluid Shear Stress,” Biophys. J., 79, pp. 1285–1297.
Davies,  P. F., Robotewskyj,  A., and Griem,  M. L., 1994, “Quantitative Studies of Endothelial Cell Adhesion. Directional Remodeling of Focal Adhesion Sites in Response to Flow Forces,” J. Clin. Invest., 93(5), pp. 2031–2038.
Rodriquez Fernandez,  J. L., Geiger,  B., Salomon,  D., and Ben-Ze’ev,  A., 1992, “Overexpression of Vinculin Suppresses Cell Moltility in BALB/c 3T3 Cells,” Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 22, pp. 127–134.
Rodriquez Fernandez,  J. L., Geiger,  B., Salomon,  D., Sabanay,  I., Zoller,  M., and Ben-Ze’ev,  A., 1992, “Suppression of Tumorigenicity in Transformed Cells After Transfection With Vinculin cDNA,” J. Cell Biol., 119(2), pp. 427–438.
Ezzell,  R. M., Goldmann,  W. H., Wang,  N., Parasharama,  N., and Ingber,  D. E., 1997, “Vinculin Promotes Cell Spreading by Mechanically Coupling Integrins to the Cytoskeleton,” Exp. Cell Res., 231, pp. 14–26.
McGrath,  J. L., Osborn,  E. A., Tardy,  Y. S., Dewey,  C. F., and Hartwig,  J. H., 2000, “Regulation of the Actin Cycle In Vivo by Actin Filament Severing,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97(12), pp. 6532–6537.
Tardy,  Y., Resnick,  N., Nagel,  T., Gimbrone,  M. A., and Dewey,  C. F., 1997, “Shear Stress Gradients Remodel Endothelial Monolayers In Vitro Via a Cell Proliferation-Migration-Loss Cycle,” Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol., 17(11), pp. 3102–3106.
White,  G. E., and Gimbrone,  M. A., 1983, “Factors Influencing the Expression of Stress Fibers In Vascular Endothelial Cells In Situ,” J. Cell Biol., 97, pp. 416–424.
Wong,  A. J., and Herman,  I. M., 1983, “Actin Filament Stress Fibers In Vascular Endothelial Cells In Vivo,” Science, 219, pp. 867–869.
Kim,  D. W., Gotlieb,  A. I., and Langille,  B. L., 1989, “In Vivo Modulation of Endothelial F-actin Microfilaments by Experimental Alterations in Shear Stress,” Arteriosclerosis (Dallas), 9(4), pp. 439–445.
Franke,  R. P., Grafe,  M., Schnittler,  H., Seiffge,  D., and Mittermayer,  C., 1984, “Induction of Human Vascular Endothelial Stress Fibers by Fluid Shear Stress,” Nature, 307, pp. 648–649.
Wechezak,  A. R., Viggers,  R. F., and Sauvage,  L. R., 1985, “Fibronectin and f -actin Redistribution in Cultured Endothelial Cells Exposed to Shear Stress,” Lab Invest, 53(6), pp. 639–647.
White,  G. E., and Fujiwara,  K., 1986, “Expression and Intracellular Distribution of Stress Fibers in Aortic Endothelium,” J. Cell Biol., 103(1), pp. 63–70.
Rudic,  R. D., Shesely,  E. G., Maeda,  N., Smithies,  O., Segal,  S. S., and Sessa,  W. C., 1998, “Direct Evidence for the Importance of Endothelium-derived Nitric Oxide In Vascular Remodeling,” J. Clin. Invest., 101(4), pp. 731–736.
Papapetropoulos,  A., Rudic,  R. D., and Sessa,  W. C., 1999, “Molecular Control of Nitric Oxide Synthases in the Cardiovascular System,” Cardiovasc. Res., 43(3), pp. 509–520.
Malek,  A. M., Izumo,  S., and Alper,  S. L., 1999, “Modulation by Pathophysiological Stimuli of the Shear Stress-induced Up-regulation of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Endothelial Cells,” Neurosurgery, 45(2), pp. 334–344.
Wedgewood,  S., Bekker,  J. M., and Black,  S. M., 2001, “Shear Stress Regulation of Endothelial NOS in Fetal Pulmonary Arterial Endothelial Cells Involves PKC,” Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 281, pp. L490–L498.
Uematsu,  M., Ohara,  Y., Navas,  J. P., Nishida,  K., Murphy,  T. J., Alexander,  R. W., Nerem,  R. M., and Harrison,  D. G., 1995, “Regulation of Endothelial Cell Nitric Oxide Synthase mRNA Expression by Shear Stress,” Am. J. Physiol., 269, pp. C1371–C1378.
Ziegler,  T., Bouzourene,  K., Harrison,  V. J., Brunner,  H. R., and Hayoz,  D., 1998, “Influence of Oscillatory and Unidirectional Flow Environments on the Expression of Endothelin and Nitric Oxide Synthase in Cultured Endothelial Cells,” Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol., 18(5), pp. 686–692.
Blackman,  B. R., Thibault,  L. E., and Barbee,  K. A., 2000, “Selective Modulation of Endothelial Cell [Ca2+]i Response to Flow by the Onset Rate of Shear Stress,” J. Biomech. Eng., 122(3), pp. 274–282.
Bao,  X., Lu,  C., and Frangos,  J., 1999, “Temporal Gradient in Shear but not Steady Shear Stress Induces PDGF-A and MCP-1 Expression in Endothelial Cells; Role of NO, NFκB, and egr-1,” Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol., 19, pp. 996–1003.
Bao,  X., Clark,  C. B., and Frangos,  J. A., 2000, “Temporal Gradient in Shear-induced Signaling Pathway: Involvement of MAP Kinase, c-fos, and Connexin-43,” Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 278, pp. H1598–H1605.
Bao,  X., Lu,  C., and Frangos,  J. A., 2001, “Mechanism of Temporal Gradients in Shear-induced ERK1/2 Activation and Proliferation in Endothelial Cells,” Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 281(1), pp. H22–29.


Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of the Dynamic Flow System and plot of motor-generated arterial waveforms. (a) The DFS is a cone and plate device that mounts on to a microscope stage and permits direct visualization of the cells adhered to the plate surface. The rotation of the cone is controlled via a timing belt connection to the programmable stepper motor. (b) An arterial waveform, developed from phase-encoding MRI of a previously characterized human abdominal aorta 22, was programmed into DFS and used to assess the biological response of ECs for all experiments in this study. Measurements from the DFS are represented for multiple cardiac cycles. Characteristics of this waveform include, a peak shear stress of 20 dyn/cm2 during systole, flow reversal during diastole to a maximum of −3 dyn/cm2, an equivalent time-average of 7.5 dyn/cm2 (depicted by the solid horizontal line), and a pulsation frequency of 1Hz. (c) A blood flow waveform acquired by ultrasound from the brachial artery of a normal human subject (left panel) was programmed into and measured from the DFS (right panel). Plots represent multiple cardiac cycles of the waveform, and the programmed waveform is modeled at a frequency of 1Hz. For the measured waveforms, (b) and (c, right), values of the angular velocity (rev/sec) were measured directly from the motor, and values of shear stress (dyn/cm2) were computed at the plate surface.
Grahic Jump Location
Shear stress induced morphological changes in endo–thelial cells. (a) Images of HUVEC were acquired at the start of the experiment (t=0) and following 24 hours of LSS and ART. The arrow points in the direction of net flow. Images are representative of 3 independent experiments per condition. (b) Time-lapse video and image analysis techniques (see Methods) were used to evaluate changes in EC aspect ratio as a function of time (every 6 minutes) following 24 hours of exposure to LSS or ART. Curves were generated from the mean aspect ratio for each time point (LSS, n=3; ART, n=3). Standard error bars are plotted every 2 hours between 12 and 24 hours to illustrate non-significant differences among the LSS (black) and ART (gray) curves (p>0.05).
Grahic Jump Location
Migration patterns and characteristics of HUVEC exposed to steady and arterial flow. (a) Migratory patterns of four individual ECs (per plot) were tracked for 24 hours under static (no flow), LSS, and ART conditions. Traces of the cell’s spatial movements are representative of the general migratory behaviors observed for that defined condition and were assessed from 3 independent experiments per condition. All distances were computed relative to a given cell’s original centroid (at t=0), which is defined here as the origin. The arrow (right side) points in the direction of net forward flow for LSS and ART. (b) Intrinsic migratory characteristics, RMS cell speed (left) and directional persistence (right), were computed for 24 hours of static, LSS, and ART conditions from the equation describing the mean square displacements. Calculations were made from a total of 30 cells pooled from three independent experiments per condition. Bars represent the mean ±SE. **p<0.005,***p<0.0001, n.s.=not significant.
Grahic Jump Location
Remodeling of cytoskeletal-associated structures following 24 hours of arterial and steady shear stress. Confocal immunofluorescence micrographs show the distribution of (a) actin and plectin in the apical (supranuclear) compartment, and (b) vinculin, in basal compartment, in HUVEC after exposure to static (left), LSS (middle), and ART (right) for 24 hours. Actin stress fibers (top) are stained green and the nuclei counterstained with SYTOX (red). Images are representative of four independent experiments per condition.
Grahic Jump Location
Shear stress induced regulation of eNOS protein and mRNA expression in HUVEC. (a) Western blot for eNOS protein following 6 and 24 hours of LSS and ART flow. Static samples represent no flow time-matched controls for each experimental condition. Samples were equally loaded with 50μg of protein, and blots are representative of 3 independent experiments per condition (Densitometry analysis normalized to static experiment: LSS 6h 0.83±0.40 vs. ART6h 1.41±0.09 arbitrary units, p=0.23; LSS 24h 4.03±0.60 vs. ART 24h 1.35±0.46 arbitrary units, p<0.05). (b) Relative mRNA levels of eNOS following 6 and 24 hours of LSS and ART were measured by real-time PCR (Taqman). Measurements were made in duplicate from three independent experiments. Results were normalized using β2 microglobulin, a gene not regulated by these stimuli. Bars represent mean ±SE (LSS: 6h, n=3, 24h, n=3; ART: 6h, n=3, 24h, n=4). *p<0.05.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In