0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Impact Responses of the Flexed Human Knee Using a Deformable Impact Interface

[+] Author and Article Information
Patrick J. Atkinson

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratories, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kettering University, Flint, MI 58504

Roger C. Haut

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratories, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824

J Biomech Eng 123(3), 205-211 (Jan 11, 2001) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1372320 History: Received May 18, 2000; Revised January 11, 2001
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Spiegler,  M., 1995, “Knees Have No Warranties,” Amer. Demographics, 17, No. 7, July, pp. 20–21.
States,  J., 1970, “Traumatic Arthritis—A Medical and Legal Dilemma,” Amer. Assoc. for Auto. Med., 14, pp. 21–28.
States, J., 1986, “Adult Occupant Injuries of the Lower Limb,” in: Biomechanics and Medical Aspects of Lower Limb Injuries, SAE, Warrendale, PA, pp. 97–107.
Fife,  D., Ginsburg,  M., and Boynton,  W., 1984, “The Role of Motor Vehicle Crashes in Causing Certain Injuries,” Public Health, 74, No. 11, pp. 1263–1264.
Atkinson,  P. J., and Haut,  R. C., 1999, “Subfracture Injuries Are Precursors to Gross Fracture in an Experimental Model of Impact Injury in the Human Knee,” Trans. Annu. Meet.—Orthop. Res. Soc., 45 .
Newberry,  W. N., Zukosky,  D. K., and Haut,  R. C., 1997, “Subfracture Insult to a Knee Joint Causes Alterations in the Bone and in the Functional Stiffness of Overlying Cartilage,” J. Orthop. Res., 15, No. 3, pp. 450–455.
Taga,  I., Shino,  K., Inoue,  M., Nakata,  K., and Maeda,  A., 1993, “Articular Cartilage Lesions in Ankles With Lateral Ligament Injury. An Arthroscopic Study,” Am. J. Sports Med., 21, No. 1, pp. 120–126.
Loomer,  R., Fisher,  C., Lloyd-Smith,  R., Sisler,  J., and Cooney,  T., 1993, “Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus,” Am. J. Sports Med., 21, No. 1, pp. 13–19.
Nagel,  D., and States,  J., 1977, “Dashboard and Bumper Knee—Will Arthritis Develop?” Amer. Assoc. Auto. Med., 21, pp. 272–278.
Volpin,  G., Dowd,  G., Stein,  H., and Bentley,  G., 1990, “Degenerative Arthritis After Intra-Articular Fractures of the Knee. Long-Term Results,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 72, pp. 634–638.
Upadhyay,  S., Moulton,  A., and Srikrishnamurthy,  K., 1983, “An Analysis of the Late Effects of Traumatic Posterior Dislocation of the Hip Without Fractures,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 65, pp. 150–152.
Nyquist,  G., and King,  A., 1985, “Lower Extremities,” Rev. Biomech. Impact Res. Inj. Auto. Env., 6, pp. 163–201.
Patrick,  L., Kroell,  C., and Mertz,  H., 1965, “Forces on the Human Body in Simulated Crashes,” Stapp Car Crash Conf., 9, pp. 237–259.
Melvin,  J., Stalnaker,  R., Alem,  N., Benson,  J., and Mohan,  D., 1975, “Impact Response and Tolerance of the Lower Extremities,” Stapp Car Crash Conf., 19, pp. 543–559.
Powell,  W., Ojala,  S., Advani,  S., and Martin,  R., 1975, “Cadaver Femur Responses to Longitudinal Impacts,” Stapp Car Crash Conf., 19, pp. 561–579.
Johnson,  D. L., Urban,  W. P., Caborn,  D. N., Vanarthos,  W. J., and Carlson,  C. S., 1998, “Articular Cartilage Changes Seen With Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Detected Bone Bruises Associated With Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture,” Am. J. Sports Med., 26, No. 3, pp. 409–414.
Vellet,  A., Marks,  P., Fowler,  P., and Munro,  T., 1991, “Occult Posttraumatic Osteochrondral Lesions of the Knee: Prevalence, Classification, and Short Term Sequelae Evaluated With MR Imaging,” Radiology, 178, pp. 271–276.
Dischinger,  P. C., Kerns,  T. J., and Kufera,  J. A., 1995, “Lower Extremity Fractures in Motor Vehicle Collisions: The Role of Driver Gender and Height,” Accid. Anal. Prev., 27, No. 4, pp. 601–606.
Viano,  D., Culver,  C., Haut,  R., Melvin,  J., Bender,  M., Culver,  R., and Levine,  R., 1978, “Bolster Impacts to the Knee and Tibia of Human Cadavers and an Anthropomorphic Dummy,” Stapp Car Crash Conf., 22, pp. 403–428.
Haut,  R. C., 1989, “Contact Pressures in the Patellofemoral Joint During Impact Loading on the Human Flexed Knee,” J. Orthop. Res., 7, pp. 272–280.
Cheng,  R., Yang,  K. H., Levine,  R. S., and King,  A. I., 1984, “Dynamic Impact Loading Under Passive Restrained Condition,” Stapp Car Crash Conf., 28, pp. 101–118.
Atkinson, P. J., and Haut, R. C., 2001, “Injuries Produced by Blunt Trauma to the Human Patellofemoral Joint Vary With Flexion Angle of the Knee,” J. Orthop. Res., in press.
Hayashi,  S., Choi,  H., Levine,  R., Yang,  K., and King,  A., 1996, “Experimental and Analytical Study of Knee Fracture Mechanisms in a Frontal Knee Impact,” Stapp Car Crash Conf., 40, pp. 161–171.
Atkinson,  P. J., Garcia,  J. J., Altiero,  N. J., and Haut,  R. C., 1997, “The Influence of Impact Interface on Human Knee Injury: Implications for Instrument Panel Design and the Lower Extremity Injury Criterion,” Stapp Car Crash Conf., 41, pp. 167–180.
Atkinson,  P. J., and Haut,  R. C., 1995, “Subfracture Insult to the Human Cadaver Patellofemoral Joint Produces Occult Injury,” J. Orthop. Res., 13, pp. 936–944.
Atkinson,  P. J., Newberry,  W. N., Atkinson,  T. S., and Haut,  R. C., 1998, “A Method to Increase the Sensitive Range of Pressure Sensitive Film,” J. Biomech., 31, No. 9, pp. 855–859.
Hale,  J. E., and Brown,  T. D., 1992, “Contact Stress Gradient Detection Limits of Pressensor Film,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 114, pp. 352–358.
Atkinson,  P. J., and Haut,  R. C., 1997, “A Method for Determining Regions of Diarthrodial Joint Contact During Dynamic Loading of the Human Knee,” Trans. Annu. Meet.—Orthop. Res. Soc., 44, p. 656.
Atkinson,  P. J., Walsh,  J. A., and Haut,  R. C., 1999, “Detection of Experimentally Produced Occult Microfractures at the Bone–Cartilage Interface in Decalcified Sections,” Biotech. Histochem., 74, No. 1, pp. 27–33.
Atkinson,  P. J., Walsh,  J. A., and Haut,  R. C., 1998, “The Human Patella: a Comparison of Three Preparation Methods,” J. Histotech., 21, No. 2, pp. 151–153.
Atkinson,  P. J., Benny,  J., Sambatur,  K., Gudipaty,  K., Maripudi,  V., and Hill,  T., 1999, “A Parametric Study of Vehicle Interior Geometry, Delta-v, and Instrument Panel Stiffness on Knee Injury and Upper Body Kinetic Energy,” Stapp Car Crash Conf., 43, pp. 203–215.
Atkinson,  P. J., Atkinson,  T. S., Altiero,  N. J., Haut,  R. C., Eusebi,  C., Maripudi,  V., and Hill,  T., 1998, “Development of an Injury Criterion for Human Surrogates to Address Current Trends in Knee-to-Instrument Panel Injuries,” Stapp Car Crash Conf., 43, pp. 13–32.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Typical test setup and load-time trace for the deformable and rigid interface experiments. Either a rigid or deformable impact interface was attached to the front of the load cell.
Grahic Jump Location
Schematics depicting the gross and microscopic injury classification scheme: (1,2,3) depict sagittal sections (the plane used for histological analysis) of the patella showing the typical locations of fractures (A), horizontal (B) occult microfractures, vertical occult microfractures (C), fissures of the articular surface (D). The gross fractures were categorized as follows: patellar fractures were more specifically documented as either transverse (A1) or comminuted (A2), split femoral fractures (E), or “Salter” fractures of the tibial plateau (F).
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic representations of the anterior patella showing typical regions of contact between the impactor and knee for the rigid and deformable impact interfaces for the three flexion angles
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic representations of the retropatellar surface and the femoral condyles showing typical regions of intra-articular contact. These regions and magnitudes of contact area were similar, regardless of impact interface (see Table 1). In some cases the deformable impact interface contacted a portion of the medial femoral condyle at the higher flexion angle. This occurs because the medial condyle becomes more exposed during normal patellar tracking at higher flexion angles.
Grahic Jump Location
Gross photos of the retropatellar surface showing a transverse patellar fracture (A) showing a frank fracture (small arrow) and the faint shadow showing how the fracture plane continues under the cartilage (large arrow). A split fracture of the femoral condyles is shown in (B).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In