Repetitive Gait of Passive Bipedal Mechanisms in a Three-Dimensional Environment

[+] Author and Article Information
Harry Dankowicz

Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061e-mail: danko@vt.edu

Jesper Adolfsson, Arne B. Nordmark

Department of Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

J Biomech Eng 123(1), 40-46 (Oct 16, 2000) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1338121 History: Received January 18, 1999; Revised October 16, 2000
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Bach, T. M., Evans, O. M., and Robinson, I. G. A., 1994, “Optimization of Inertial Characteristics of the Transfemoral Limb Prostheses Using a Computer Simulation of Human Walking,” Proc. Eighth Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society for Biomechanics, pp. 212–213.
Tsai,  C.-S., and Mansour,  J. M., 1986, “Swing Phase Simulation and Design of Above Knee Prostheses, ” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 108, p. 65.
Kay, B. A., 1998, private communication, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Diedrich,  F. J., and Warren,  W. H., 1995, “Why Change Gaits? Dynamics of the Walk–Run Transition,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform, 21, No. 1, pp. 183–202.
Warren,  W. H., Young,  D. S., and Lee,  D. N., 1986, “Visual Control of Step Length During Running Over Irregular Terrain,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept Perform, 12, No. 3, pp. 259–266.
Hurmuzlu,  Y., Basdogan,  C., and Stoianovici,  D., 1996, “Kinematics and Dynamic Stability of the Locomotion of Post-Polio Patients,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 118, pp. 405–411.
Basmajian, J. V., and Tuttle, R., 1973, “EMG of Locomotion in Gorilla and Man,” in: Control of Posture and Locomotion, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 599–609.
McGeer,  T., 1990, “Passive Dynamic Walking,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 9, pp. 62–82.
McGeer, T., 1990, “Passive Walking With Knees,” Proc. IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, pp. 1640–1645.
Chatterjee, A., and Garcia, M., 1998, “Small Slope Implies Low Speed in Passive Dynamic Walking, ” submitted to Dynamics and Stability of Systems.
Coleman,  M., and Ruina,  A., 1998, “An Uncontrolled Toy That Can Walk But Cannot Stand Still,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, No. 16, pp. 3658–3661.
Garcia,  M., Chatterjee,  A., Ruina,  A., and Coleman,  M., 1998, “The Simplest Walking Model: Stability, Complexity, and Scaling,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 120, pp. 281–288.
Garcia, M., Chatterjee, A., and Ruina, A., 1998, “Efficiency, Speed, and Scaling of Passive Dynamic Bipedal Walking,” submitted to Dynamics and Stability of Systems.
Brogliato, B., 1999, Nonsmooth Mechanics: Models, Dynamic and Control, Springer-Verlag, London–New York.
Ju,  M.-S., and Mansour,  J. M., 1988, “Simulations of the Double Limb Support Phase of Human Gait, ” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 110, pp. 223–229.
Lesser, M., 1995, The Analysis of Complex Nonlinear Mechanical Systems, World Scientific, Singapore.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vettering, W. T., and Flannery, B. P ., 1992, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York.
Guckenheimer, J., and Holmes, P., 1990, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Adolfsson, J., Dankowicz, H., and Nordmark, A. B., 2000, “3D Passive Walkers: Stability Analysis in the Presence of Discontinuities,” Nonlinear Dyn., in press.
Rose, J., and Gamble, J. G., 1994, Human Walking, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
Formal’sky, A. M., 1996, “Ballistic Locomotion of a Biped. Design and Control of Two Biped Machines,” CISM Advanced School on Modelling and Simulation of Human and Walking Robots Locomotion, Udine.
Mochon,  S., and McMahon,  T., 1980, “Ballistic Walking: An Improved Model,” Math. Biosci., 52, pp. 241–260.
McGeer,  T., 1993, “Dynamics and Control of Bipedal Locomotion,” J. Theor. Biol., 163, pp. 277–314.
Howell, G. W., and Baillieul, J., 1998, “Simple Controllable Walking Mechanisms Which Exhibit Bifurcations,” in: Proc. 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3027–3032.
Fowble, J. V., and Kuo, A. D., 1996, “Stability and Control of Passive Locomotion in 3D, ” in: Proc. Conference on Biomechanics and Neural Control of Movement, pp. 28–29.
Pratt, J. E., 1995, “Virtual Model Control of a Biped Walking Robot,” M. Eng. thesis, MIT.
Pratt, J., and Pratt G., 1998 “Intuitive Control of a Planar Bipedal Walking Robot,” in: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA ’98), Leuven, Belgium.


Grahic Jump Location
Geometry and mass distribution of the planar walker. The toe circles represent the cylindrical feet used in the simulations. Note that the heels have no physical significance in our model.
Grahic Jump Location
A typical gait cycle of the planar walker illustrated by six characteristic events
Grahic Jump Location
The path from a constrained walker with cylindrical feet to an unconstrained mechanism with point contacts
Grahic Jump Location
Geometric make-up and mass properties of the three-dimensional mechanism
Grahic Jump Location
A simulated gait sequence of the planar walker including the trajectories of the hip, a knee, and a toe. Note that the time interval between successive images of the walker slightly exceeds a full stride time.
Grahic Jump Location
A simulated gait sequence of the unconstrained mechanism including the trajectory of the center of the hip over eleven consecutive steps. The percentages correspond to the time of the event relative to one stride. Stride time = 1.62 s, stride length = 0.7 m. The largest modulus of any eigenvalue of the linearized dynamics in the vicinity of this periodic orbit is 0.9685, i.e., weakly asymptotically stable.
Grahic Jump Location
The time histories of the hip and knee angles of the left leg during one stride of the gait in Fig. 6. Note that after the knee impact, the knee angle is less than the hip angle, corresponding to a “locked” knee.
Grahic Jump Location
Trajectory of the center of mass of the mechanism projected on the inclined plane and the toe-point locations. The numbered events along the continuous trajectory indicate contact being established or interrupted by the corresponding toes. The center of mass spends 0.054 s outside the lateral support line.
Grahic Jump Location
Bifurcation diagrams of five different model mechanisms under variations in slope showing stable (solid) and unstable (dashed) periodic solutions. All solution branches in the compliant models terminate in foot scuffing. The limping-gait branches in the constrained models are born in pitchfork bifurcations from the main branch (the other branch is not shown). The numbers included in the top five panels indicate the average gait speed. The bottom panel is a blow-up of the stable region in the fifth panel showing the birth of quasi-periodic (dotted) and eventually chaotic (cloud) solutions at slope 0.0795.
Grahic Jump Location
The amplitude of lateral oscillations of a branch of periodic solutions under a one-parameter variation of the ground compliance (here the damping is proportional to the square root of the stiffness). The inlays indicate the location of the toe points during the gait. Note, in particular, the switch in the right-most inlay at 0.5 s between the inner and outer toe, and at 0.58 s between the inner toe on one foot and the outer toe on the other foot.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In