A Fibril-Network-Reinforced Biphasic Model of Cartilage in Unconfined Compression

[+] Author and Article Information
J. Soulhat, M. D. Buschmann, A. Shirazi-Adl

Biomedical Engineering Institute, Department of Chemical Engineering and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

J Biomech Eng 121(3), 340-347 (Jun 01, 1999) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2798330 History: Received June 17, 1997; Revised December 09, 1998; Online October 30, 2007


Cartilage mechanical function relies on a composite structure of a collagen fibrillar network entrapping a proteoglycan matrix. Previous biphasic or poroelastic models of this tissue, which have approximated its composite structure using a homogeneous solid phase, have experienced difficulties in describing measured material responses. Progress to date in resolving these difficulties has demonstrated that a constitutive law that is successful for one test geometry (confined compression) is not necessarily successful for another (unconfined compression). In this study, we hypothesize that an alternative fibril-reinforced composite biphasic representation of cartilage can predict measured material responses and explore this hypothesis by developing and solving analytically a fibril-reinforced biphasic model for the case of uniaxial unconfined compression with frictionless compressing platens. The fibrils were considered to provide stiffness in tension only. The lateral stiffening provided by the fibril network dramatically increased the frequency dependence of disk rigidity in dynamic sinusoidal compression and the magnitude of the stress relaxation transient, in qualitative agreement with previously published data. Fitting newly obtained experimental stress relaxation data to the composite model allowed extraction of mechanical parameters from these tests, such as the rigidity of the fibril network, in addition to the elastic constants and the hydraulic permeability of the remaining matrix. Model calculations further highlight a potentially important difference between homogeneous and fibril-reinforced composite models. In the latter type of model, the stresses carried by different constituents can be dissimilar, even in sign (compression versus tension) even though strains can be identical. Such behavior, resulting only from a structurally physiological description, could have consequences in the efforts to understand the mechanical signals that determine cellular and extracellular biological responses to mechanical loads in cartilage.

Copyright © 1999 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In