Strain Softening in Rat Left Ventricular Myocardium

[+] Author and Article Information
J. L. Emery, A. D. McCulloch

Department of Bioengineering, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412

J. H. Omens

Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412

J Biomech Eng 119(1), 6-12 (Feb 01, 1997) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2796067 History: Received April 18, 1995; Revised January 03, 1996; Online October 30, 2007


We investigated whether strain softening (or the Mullins effect) may explain the reduced left ventricular stiffness previously associated with the strain-history-dependent preconditioning phenomenon. Passive pressure–volume relations were measured in the isolated, arrested rat heart during LV balloon inflation and deflation cycles. With inflation to a new higher maximum pressure, the pressure–volume relation became less stiff, particularly in the low (diastolic) pressure range, without a significant change in unloaded ventricular volume. In five different loading protocols in which the maximum passive cycle pressure ranged from 10 to 120 mmHg, we measured increases at 10 mmHg in LV volume up to 350 percent of unloaded volume that depended significantly on the history (p < 0.05) and magnitude (p < 0.01) of maximum previous pressure. Although a quasi-linear viscoelastic model based on the pressure-relaxation response could produce a nonlinear pressure–volume relation with hysteresis, it was unable to show any significant change in ventricular stiffness with new maximum pressure. We incorporated a strain softening theory proposed by Johnson and Beatty (1992) into the model by modifying the elastic response with a volume-amplification factor that depended on the maximum previous pressure. This model more accurately reproduced the experimentally observed behavior. Thus, the preconditioning behavior of the myocardium is better explained by strain softening rather than viscoelasticity and may be due to damage to elastic components, rather than the effects of viscous tissue components.

Copyright © 1997 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.






Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In