0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Observation and Quantification of Gas Bubble Formation on a Mechanical Heart Valve

[+] Author and Article Information
Hsin-Yi Lin, Brian A. Bianccucci, J. M. Tarbell

Bioengineering Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802-4400

Steven Deutsch, Arnold A. Fontaine

Applied Research Laboratory, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802-4400

J Biomech Eng 122(4), 304-309 (Mar 22, 2000) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1287171 History: Received September 22, 1999; Revised March 22, 2000
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic diagram of the mock circulatory flow loop
Grahic Jump Location
An example of the before (top) and after (bottom) band-pass-filtering pressure trace and its power spectrum; Crms=19.5 mmHg in this case
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of the videographic system for visualizing the mitral valve and ultrasonic detection of bubbles in the aortic outlet
Grahic Jump Location
A series of images showing the mechanism by which nuclei were generated after the cavitation vapor condensed back into the solution under conditions of high Crms and high PCO2: (a) cavitation at the edge of the occluder and around the central strut (0.986 ms); (b) nucleus cloud left behind after the collapse of vortex cavitation (4.930 ms); (c) due to the diffusion of CO2 into the nuclei, bubbles became larger (5.914 ms)
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of the mechanism of gas bubble formation: (a) cavitation; (b) enlarged gas nuclei being carried away immediately after cavitation collapse; (c) gas bubbles generated later on the valve surface; (d) nuclei that remained on the valve surface grew larger due to gas diffusion or coalescence; (e) gas bubbles swept from the surface when the valve reopened
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Plots of gray level (G.L.) versus PCO2 at different Crms; (b) G.L. versus Crms at different PCO2. Error bars represent 95 percent confidence intervals.
Grahic Jump Location
Ultrasound images at different operating conditions: (a) high Crms and low PCO2; G.L.=786; (b) medium Crms and high PCO2; G.L.=1064; (c) high Crms and high PCO2; G.L.=1551. D is the estimated bubble diameter.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In