0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

The Influence of Out-of-Plane Geometry on the Flow Within a Distal End-to-Side Anastomosis

[+] Author and Article Information
S. J. Sherwin, O. Shah, D. J. Doorly, J. Peiró, Y. Papaharilaou

Biomedical Flow Group, Aeronautics Department, Imperial College, London, SW7 2BY, United Kingdom

N. Watkins, C. G. Caro

Department of Biological and Medical Systems, Imperial College, London, SW7 2BX, United Kingdom

C. L. Dumoulin

GE Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, NY 12309

J Biomech Eng 122(1), 86-95 (Jul 21, 1999) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.429630 History: Received May 06, 1998; Revised July 21, 1999
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Bryan,  A., and Angelini,  G., 1994, “The Biology of Saphenous Vein Graft Occlusion: Etiology and Strategies for Prevention,” Curr. Opin. Cardiol., 9, pp. 641–649.
Davies,  P., 1995, “Flow Mediated Endothelial Mechanotransduction,” Physiol. Rev., 75, pp. 519–560.
McIntire, L., 1997, “Differential Gene Regulation Induced by Flow in Vascular Cells: Implications for Gene Therapy,” in: Proc. International Conference on New Frontiers in Biomechanical Engineering, Bioengineering Division, JSME.
Ojha,  M., Ethier,  C., Johnston,  K., and Cobbold,  R., 1990, “Steady and Pulsatile Flow Fields in an End-to-Side Arterial Anastomosis Model,” J. Vasc. Surg., 20, pp. 311–317.
Sottiuari,  V., Yao,  J., Batson,  R., Sue,  S., Jones,  R., and Nakamura,  Y., 1989, “Distal Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia: Hystopathologic Character and Biogenesis,” Ann. Vasc. Surg., 29, pp. 26–33.
Bassiouny,  H., White,  S., Glagov,  S., Choi,  E., Giddens,  D., and Zarins,  C., 1992, “Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia: Mechanical Injury or Flow Induced,” J. Vasc. Surg., 15, pp. 708–717.
Ojha,  M., 1993, “Spatial and Temporal Variations of Wall Shear Stress Within an End-to-Side Arterial Anastomosis Model,” J. Biomech., 114, No. 12, pp. 1377–1388.
Lei,  M., Kleinstreuer,  C., and Archie,  J., 1997, “Haemodynamic Simulation and Computer-Aided Designs of Graft-Artery Junctions,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 119, pp. 343–348.
Ku,  D., and Giddens,  D., 1983, “Pulsatile Flow in a Model Carotid Bifurcation,” Atherosclerosis, 3, pp. 31–39.
Friedman,  M., Bargeron,  C., Deters,  O., Hutchins,  G., and Mark,  F., 1987, “Correlation Between Wall Shear and Intimal Thickness at a Coronary Artery Branch,” Atherosclerosis, 68, pp. 27–33.
Yamamoto,  T., Tanaka,  H., Jones,  C. J. H., Lever,  M., Parker,  K. H., Kimura,  A., Hiramatsu,  O., Ogasawara,  Y., Tsujioka,  K., Caro,  C. G., and Kajiya,  F., 1992, “Blood Velocity Profiles in the Origin of the Canine Renal Artery and Their Relevance in the Localization and Development of Atherosclerosis,” Arterioscler. Thromb., 12, No. 5, pp. 626–632.
Asakura,  T., and Karino,  T., 1990, “Flow Patterns and Spatial Distribution of Atherosclerotic Lesions in Human Coronary Arteries,” Circ. Res., 66, pp. 1045–1066.
Steinman,  D., Frayne,  R., Zhang,  X.-D., Butt,  B., and Ethier,  C., 1996, “MR Measurements and Numerical Simulation of Steady Flow in an End-to-Side Anastomosis Model,” J. Biomech., 29, No. 4, pp. 537–542.
Hofer,  M., Rappitsch,  G., Perktold,  K., Trubel,  W., and Schima,  H., 1996, “Numerical Study of Wall Mechanics and Fluid Dynamics in End-to-Side Anastomoses and Correlation to Initimal Hyperplasia,” J. Biomech., 29, pp. 1297–1308.
Henry,  F., Collins,  M., Hughes,  P., and How,  T., 1996, “Numerical Investigation of Steady Flow in Proximal and Distal End-to-Side Anastomoses,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 118, pp. 302–310.
White,  S., Zarins,  C., Giddens,  D., Bassiouny,  H., Loth,  F., Jones,  S., and Glagov,  S., 1993, “Hemodynamics Patterns in Two Models of End-to-Side Vascular Graft Anastomoses: Effects of Pulsatility, Flow Division, Reynolds Number and Hood Length,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 114, pp. 104–115.
Caro,  C., Doorly,  D., Tarnawski,  M., Scott,  K., Long,  Q., and Dumoulin,  C., 1996, “Non-Planar Curvature and Branching of Arteries and Non-Planar-Type Flow,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 452, pp. 185–197.
Sherwin, S., Shah, O., Doorly, D., Mclean, M., Watkins, N., Caro, C., Peiro, J., Tarnawski, M., and Dumoulin, C., 1997, “Visualisation and Computational Study of Flow in Model Planar and Non-planar End-to-Side Arterial Bypass Grafts,” Physiological Society Abstracts, Plymouth.
Ding, Z., and Friedman, M., 1997, “Variability in Planarity of the Aortic Bifurcation Measured From Magnetic Resonance Images,” in: Bioengineering Conference, ASME BED-Vol. 35.
DaSilva,  A., Carpenter,  T., How,  T., and Harris,  P., 1997, “Stable Vortices Within Vein Cuffs Inhibit Anastomotic Myointimal Hyperplasia?” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc Surg., 14, No. 3, pp. 157–163.
Loth,  F., Jones,  S., Giddens,  D., Bassiouny,  H., Glagov,  S., and Zarins,  C., 1997, “Measurement of Velocity and Wall Shear Stress Inside a PTFE Vascular Graft Model Under Steady Flow Conditions,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 119, No. 2, pp. 187–195.
Sherwin,  S., and Karniadakis,  G., 1996, “Tetrahedral hp Finite Elements: Algorithms and Flow Simulations,” J. Comp. Physiol., 124, pp. 14–45.
Moore,  J. E., Maiser,  S., Ku,  D., and Bösiger,  P., 1994, “Haemodynamics in the Abdominal Aorta: a Comparison of In-Vitro and In-Vivo Measurements,” J. Appl. Physiol., 76, pp. 1520–1527.
Friedman,  M. H., 1993, “Arteriosclerosis Research Using Vascular Flow Models: From 2-D Branches to Compliant Replicas,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 115, No. 4, pp. 595–601.
Karniadakis,  G., Israeli,  M., and Orszag,  S., 1991, “High-Order Splitting Methods for the Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations,” J. Comp. Physiol., 97, pp. 414–443.
Peiro, J., and Sayma, A. I., 1995, “A 3-D Unstructured Multigrid Navier–Stokes Solver,” in: K. W. Morton and M. J. Baines, eds., Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics,V, Oxford University Press.
Peraire,  J., Peiro,  J., and Morgan,  K., 1993, “Multigrid Solution of the 3-D Compressible Euler Equations on Unstructured Tetrahedral Grids,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 36, pp. 1029–1044.
Dean,  W., 1928, “The Streamline Motion of Fluid in a Curved Pipe,” Philos. Mag., 5, pp. 673–695.
Tuttle,  E., 1990, “Laminar Flow in Twisted Pipes” J. Fluid Mech., 219, pp. 545–570.
Kao,  H., 1987, “Torsion Effects on Fully Developed Flow in a Helical Pipe,” J. Fluid Mech., 184, pp. 335–356.
Zabielski,  L., and Mestel,  A., 1998, “Steady Flow in a Helically Symmetric Pipe,” J. Fluid Mech., 370, pp. 297–320.
Doorly, D., Peiro, J., Sherwin, S., Shah, O., Caro, C., Tarnawski, M., Maclean, M., Dumoulin, C., and Axel, L., 1997, “Helix and Model Graft Flows: MRI Measurements and CFD Simulations,” Proc. ASME FED Meeting, ASME Paper No. FEDSM-97-3423.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Model geometries of distal end of the 45 deg end-to-side anastomosis: (a) planar, (b) nonplanar
Grahic Jump Location
Experimental measurement of the axial flow in a straight pipe at a Reynolds number of Re=390. Also shown is the least-squares fit to a parabolic profile, which is coincident with the theoretical parabolic solution at this Reynolds number.
Grahic Jump Location
Numerical calculation of the normalized wall shear stress in the planar anastomoses model around the bed region using a polynomial order of: (a) p=2, (b) p=4, (c) p=6. The same contour levels have been used in each plot.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison CFD (top) and MRI (middle) axial velocity, normalized by flow rate per unit are, at (a)0.25D distal to the toe, (b)2D distal to the toe, and (c)5D distal to the toe. Also shown are a comparison of the CFD (dotted line) and MRI (solid line) profile of velocity extracted along the constant z centerline and normalized by mean velocity ū.  
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison CFD (top) and MRI (bottom) crossflow data for the planar model at 0.25D distal to the toe: (a) horizontal v component, (b) vertical w component, (c) crossflow streamlines. All data are normalized by the mean velocity ū.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of the CFD normalized axial velocity in planar (top) and nonplanar (bottom): (a) toe, (b)2D distal to the toe, and (c)5D distal to the toe
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of CFD computed normalized horizontal v-component crossflow velocity in planar (top) and nonplanar (bottom): (a) toe, (b)2D distal to the toe, and (c)5D distal to the toe
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of CFD normalized computed vertical w-component crossflow velocity in planar (top) and nonplanar (bottom): (a) toe, (b)2D distal to the toe, and (c)5D distal to the toe
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of the normalized axial velocity at the heel of the anastomosis for: (a) planar, (b) nonplanar geometries
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of CFD computed wall shear stress normalized by the steady straight pipe wall shear stress for: (a) planar, (b) nonplanar geometries
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of CFD pressure coefficients along the wall for: (a) planar, (b) nonplanar geometries

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In