0
Technical Brief

Male and Female Cervical Spine Biomechanics and Anatomy: Implication for Scaling Injury Criteria

[+] Author and Article Information
Narayan Yoganandan

Professor
Department of Neurosurgery,
Medical College of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee, WI 53226;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Chair of Biomedical Engineering,
Medical College of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee, WI 53226
e-mail: yoga@mcw.edu

Cameron R. Bass

Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Duke University,
Raleigh, NC 27708

Liming Voo

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory,
Laurel, MD 20723

Frank A. Pintar

Department of Neurosurgery,
Medical College of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee, WI 53226

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received November 28, 2016; final manuscript received March 15, 2017; published online April 6, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Joel D Stitzel.This work is in part a work of the U.S. Government. ASME disclaims all interest in the U.S. Government's contributions.

J Biomech Eng 139(5), 054502 (Apr 06, 2017) (5 pages) Paper No: BIO-16-1480; doi: 10.1115/1.4036313 History: Received November 28, 2016; Revised March 15, 2017

There is an increased need to develop female-specific injury criteria and anthropomorphic test devices (dummies) for military and automotive environments, especially as women take occupational roles traditionally reserved for men. Although some exhaustive reviews on the biomechanics and injuries of the human spine have appeared in clinical and bioengineering literatures, focus has been largely ignored on the difference between male and female cervical spine responses and characteristics. Current neck injury criteria for automotive dummies for assessing crashworthiness and occupant safety are obtained from animal and human cadaver experiments, computational modeling, and human volunteer studies. They are also used in the military. Since the average human female spines are smaller than average male spines, metrics specific to the female population may be derived using simple geometric scaling, based on the assumption that male and female spines are geometrically scalable. However, as described in this technical brief, studies have shown that the biomechanical responses between males and females do not obey strict geometric similitude. Anatomical differences in terms of the structural component geometry are also different between the two cervical spines. Postural, physiological, and motion responses under automotive scenarios are also different. This technical brief, focused on such nonuniform differences, underscores the need to conduct female spine-specific evaluations/experiments to derive injury criteria for this important group of the population.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In